VANESSA HUDGENS

Got this email about a week ago:

from: Jim
date: Aug 31, 2007 7:49 PM
subject: Vanessa Anne Hudgens Nude Photos ZOMG!

http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_272615782.shtml

Vanessa Anne Hudgens nude photos taken for her boyfriend Zac Efron have been leaked the National Enquirer is reporting. The magazine reports that pictures that star Vanessa Hudgens took were intended only for costar slash boyfriend Zac Efron but have recently surfaced, and their discovery could bring down the wholesome Disney blockbuster that’s captivated millions of teen fans.

“Vanessa took some suggestive shots of herself in the buff as a surprise for Zac,” a source told the Enquirer. Now the scandal is threatening to destroy the “High School Musical” phenomenon sweeping America, Enquirer reports.

The Enquirer reports that it has learned that a third party has obtained the sexy pictures that were meant just for Vanessa and Zac. “Vanessa’s only 18, so she had no idea how her flirtatious act could threaten the future of the multimillion-dollar plans Disney has for the show,” said the source. “She just wanted to keep Zac interested.”

But the brunette beauty’s naughty photos could throw Disney’s massive marketing and production plans into complete turmoil.

“It’s a kids’ show, aimed a children, teenagers and their parents and starring a bunch of cute, wholesome youngsters,” said a show insider. “Naked pictures of one of the stars would be catastrophic. “It could bring the whole ‘High School Musical’ franchise to its knees.”

Could this be one of the pics?

UPDATE: Now in tagless higher res! And yes, it’s been confirmed to be real! Thanks Steevyn!

84 thoughts on “VANESSA HUDGENS

  1. I say… yes it is!

    #1 | Comment by Jeff — September 6, 2007 @ 11:18 am

  2. first to say first!

    #2 | Comment by 31 — September 6, 2007 @ 11:23 am

  3. MORE!

    #3 | Comment by 31 — September 6, 2007 @ 11:24 am

  4. ZOMG! That’s my email! I’m like, famous or something. Here’s hoping that’s photoshop and there are better pictures on the way…

    #4 | Comment by Jim — September 6, 2007 @ 11:27 am

  5. “She’s only 18…so she didn’t know…..” Bullshit. I am tired of this assumed “Innocence” people seem to have about girls out there.

    #5 | Comment by Pokeher — September 6, 2007 @ 11:36 am

  6. agreed, unfortunately named poster before me. innocent girls don’t shave their snizz’.

    it might just be her. on closer inspection, certain things popped into view that might solidify this one as real: she has the same body type, certain features on her body match (same shoulder to hip ratio, same legs and hands, same diamond shaped belly button), and the girl in the picture is staying in the kind of expensive hotel room that disney a-listers typically get. my revised verdict is that this is the real mccoy.

    let’s just pray for higher res down the line.

    #6 | Comment by Jim — September 6, 2007 @ 11:47 am

  7. Regarding the picture, meh. She’s okay, I guess.

    Regarding “innocent wholesome teenagers”, NO SUCH THING. There are less wholesome teenagers in the world than girls on the interbutts.

    #7 | Comment by ZekeDMS — September 6, 2007 @ 11:50 am

  8. Yeah girls at that age innately know how to get nastified. “Just trying to keep Zac interested.” Yeah right, just an innocent mistake. Still, I love that kind of body.

    #8 | Comment by Kewtr — September 6, 2007 @ 12:11 pm

  9. who?

    #9 | Comment by lswalker — September 6, 2007 @ 12:17 pm

  10. “Naked pictures of one of the stars would be catastrophic. “It could bring the whole ‘High School Musical’ franchise to its knees.”

    Doubtfull!

    In fact, this is just the type of thing a Studio wants! Of course they have to portray the “Hurt and semi-sympathetic Boss”, but they know that this will probably attract more viewers.

    For example; I never had any intention of seeing HSM2, mainy cuzz I never saw or wanted to see HSM1. But perhaps, now I will! (But still, probably not!)

    #10 | Comment by MacDaddy — September 6, 2007 @ 12:18 pm

  11. Well done.

    Now, bring on the rest of ’em … in high res!

    #11 | Comment by Bender — September 6, 2007 @ 12:30 pm

  12. “She didn’t know how this could screw up disneys plans for her”
    Bull.
    She probably did these and released them so she could escape doing Disney movies.
    When I was 17-18 I would have wanted to get the hell away from doing cutesy happy stuff all the time too.

    #12 | Comment by Tony — September 6, 2007 @ 12:33 pm

  13. i dont think this would screw it up……i watched HSM2 just because of her and Ashley tisdale…they really sexed up their images for the movie…if anything this may help!

    #13 | Comment by kahuna21 — September 6, 2007 @ 12:42 pm

  14. Hey Jim, I’m no Hollywood A-lister or anything but I don’t think that’s some swanky hotel room. There’s Christmas lighting on the ceiling. Only little girls and/or people with horrible/no interior decorating skills/blind would put that up in their room. (Bring on the fag comments, you fuckers.)

    Yeah, anyways, this all seems a little too convenient, I mean, why didn’t pictures of her pop up before #2 came out, or when she was still underage?

    AIDS, it’s crack-baby approved.

    #14 | Comment by Dr. Phil mmkay? — September 6, 2007 @ 2:05 pm

  15. more chabert,now?

    #15 | Comment by 31 — September 6, 2007 @ 2:05 pm

  16. BTW, I personally think that Tisdale>Hudgens. I think she’s cuter AND has puffier nipples…plus I like to fuck Jews. Hudgens seems bleh. Again, my opinion, you cunt-monkeys.

    #16 | Comment by Dr. Phil mmkay? — September 6, 2007 @ 2:09 pm

  17. I 100% believe such pictures exist. However thats not one of them. It doesn’t look anything like her, plus unless its a very old pic, her breast are bigger than that. For actually nice looking bikini pictures of her, see the ones I posted in the Jojo thread. And then sit around and wait for the real nude ones 🙂 I’m still waiting on nude Tisdale too. Oh, and Brenda Song whilst I’m at it.

    #17 | Comment by thiessen — September 6, 2007 @ 2:27 pm

  18. yeah… it has nothing to do with my post in the other thread:

    4. high school musical fan (11:00:15) :

    I hope I tag this right…

    dude… did you see this?

    You need to do a post.

    #18 | Comment by high school musical fan — September 6, 2007 @ 2:37 pm

  19. You guys want higher res??

    http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i116/Voohoo/vanessahudgens_nude.jpg

    #19 | Comment by Felipe — September 6, 2007 @ 3:34 pm

  20. Looks real to me.

    #20 | Comment by Felipe — September 6, 2007 @ 3:39 pm

  21. The face looks photoshopped. FAKE!

    #21 | Comment by Bill Clay — September 6, 2007 @ 3:56 pm

  22. So its only me who doesn’t think the face even LOOKS like Vanessa’s then?

    Can’t wait till the real pix come out. Not really after a sex tape though if that little orange bufont headed alien is in it…

    #22 | Comment by thiessen — September 6, 2007 @ 4:07 pm

  23. the girl in the hotel room has the same bracelet as the girl on the beach..

    and what is that a louis vuitton bag on the dresser?

    i hate to say it but this looks a lot like it might be real.. what a bummer because her face looks like shit in this pic… i was hoping it was fake.. if it was a photoshop wouldnt they choose a pic that is flattering and doesnt look like my cleaning lady?

    #23 | Comment by yawn — September 6, 2007 @ 4:54 pm

  24. #14 some of the most expensive hotel rooms around are little shitboxes.. they’ve just been around so long that their reputation precedes them..

    ever stay at la valencia in la jolla or the plaza in ny.. perfect examples of overrated overpriced relics.

    #24 | Comment by yawn — September 6, 2007 @ 5:00 pm

  25. Boo for really old news.

    I read about this last Sunday/Monday

    #25 | Comment by dex — September 6, 2007 @ 5:12 pm

  26. got the email a week ago and posted it right after I sugested it… dude… give credit where credit is due. FUCK!

    #26 | Comment by high school musical fan — September 6, 2007 @ 5:14 pm

  27. this is a shop.

    i can tell from some of the pixels, and having seen quite a few shops in my time.

    #27 | Comment by AngelBaby — September 6, 2007 @ 5:15 pm

  28. Bangle = generic looking, Bag = one of the most bootlegged/copied/faked bag designs of all time, available from every dodgy holiday town market stall. Plus, the holiday pic you refer to clearly show them using several disposable cameras. They can’t have used them to take dodgy photos for obvious reasons, and if they had decent enough digicams or camera phones with them on the same holiday why use disposable ones? Especially if they were worried about publicity leaks from nosy print shop assistants who would try and sell stuff to the press?

    Trust me I’d love this to be a pic of a naked Vanessa, I’d probably pay good money for dent pics, as I seem to be one of the few people on here who likes her! But I really can’t see this particular pic being genuine. Its either a bad shop job, or not even her. Because to me that face is the right ethinc origin (just) and hair (just) but thats about it, the proportions of her face just look wrong. I should know, my wife and kids watch HSM every frickin day, much to my annoyance.

    I can totally see it being a genuine story though, but disney (who seem to own the vast majority of the american media nowadays) will either bid the highest and destroy the evidence, or just sue. The only hope we have is that whatever underpaid overworked guy is hired by Disney to destroy them scans and leaks them quickly to the net as an act of rebellion.

    #28 | Comment by thiessen — September 6, 2007 @ 5:42 pm

  29. That was meant to be “decent” pics btw, I haven’t indented some new kind of porn called “dent” porn.

    Looking at the higher res pic, its SLIGHTLY more believable, but still looks like some dodgy old cleaning lady with a pudgy face to me. If it is real I hope the other pictures are more flattering. I also wish they’d been taken after her boobs got bigger. Oh well!

    #29 | Comment by thiessen — September 6, 2007 @ 5:47 pm

  30. i think we’re missing the point here… young naked girl… nice perky tits…

    fake or no fake … it shall be fapped to.

    #30 | Comment by DoctorOfStyle — September 6, 2007 @ 5:53 pm

  31. Bitch has got a garden growing down there

    #31 | Comment by Tony — September 6, 2007 @ 6:13 pm

  32. Vanessa has pierced her bellybutton.. no piercing in teh bellybutton on that nude pic 😐

    #32 | Comment by CuteKnut — September 6, 2007 @ 6:19 pm

  33. I dont think its her. her hair is always curly, and longer

    #33 | Comment by dtd — September 6, 2007 @ 7:27 pm

  34. by the way, TMZ confirms that it is real:
    http://www.tmz.com/2007/09/06/hsm-nude-pic-its-the-real-deal/

    #34 | Comment by UnAimed — September 6, 2007 @ 7:38 pm

  35. http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/6/6d/HighResPICHSR.jpg

    Even higher res, #19. And no watermark.

    #35 | Comment by Steevyn — September 6, 2007 @ 8:18 pm

  36. Really? Her publicist said that particular pic was real? Wow. Well in that case I re-iterate my earlier statement: “I hope the other pictures are more flattering. I also wish they’d been taken after her boobs got bigger.”

    Celeb nude pics and vids are usually dissapointing, a nice, tasteful, well lit playboy spread might be slightly more likely now that everyone’s seen it now. Vanessa, if you’re reading this? Please? lol

    #36 | Comment by thiessen — September 6, 2007 @ 8:29 pm

  37. Yummy yum. I likes my Vanessa any way I can get her.
    Is this picture from Christmas ’06?

    #37 | Comment by tool — September 6, 2007 @ 9:11 pm

  38. This is not a shop. I can tell from the lack of pixels, and having seen many genuine noods in my time.

    #38 | Comment by ZekeDMS — September 6, 2007 @ 10:27 pm

  39. I fucking dreamt about this moment for days on end. YES!!! what a banging bod, nice fucking trimmed bush, and DAMN what a nice way to ruin her ‘Disney’ image. MUIHAHAHAHAHA

    #39 | Comment by KaKa — September 6, 2007 @ 10:55 pm

  40. HOLY FUCK.

    I HATE NO IDEA WHO THIS GIRL IS.

    #40 | Comment by Skarasta — September 6, 2007 @ 11:59 pm

  41. Have***
    fuck double post fuck.

    #41 | Comment by Skarasta — September 7, 2007 @ 12:00 am

  42. I agree with KaKa. Great body, great chest, great trim work without going overboard. Two thumbs up.

    Plus going from Susan Sarandon to looking at this, I mean how can you complain?

    #42 | Comment by Kewtr — September 7, 2007 @ 12:02 am

  43. I love how all the shop “experts” were claiming it was fake, and it turned out to be real. Too good to be true, huh?

    #43 | Comment by Pokeher — September 7, 2007 @ 1:11 am

  44. Anytime.

    What’s Emma Watson been up to lately? :/ I miss her :[

    #44 | Comment by Steevyn — September 7, 2007 @ 1:30 am

  45. ^^ 43 – THANK YOU!! I was going to post that myself. I’ve taught photoshop classes and I would be VERY hard pressed to think this was a forged pic. If it was (which we now know it is not) it’s was VERY well done. Look at the lighting on her from the small lights, as well as the shadows on her matching the surroundings.

    Doesn’t look like a hotel room. Probably either a room on a set (trailer?) or her home. Note the artwork behind the head of the bed, the lamp on the dresser, the holiday lights, what appears to be an intercom/radio, and no hooks on the side of the window to tie back the curtains. See how the drapery around the bed is tied? I’d say this is her room (home or her trailer).

    AWESOME little body, great little waist and tummy, nice hips, nice boobies, needs to trim down to a landing strip or hardwood floor, though, but hell, who’s to argue with an 18 year old starlet taking nudie pics of herself?

    EVERY ONE OF US WOULD HIT THIS!

    #45 | Comment by Webpager — September 7, 2007 @ 1:31 am

  46. I’d hit it.
    I have to say, though, that it’s bullshit that these people are going on and on about how this is going to destroy Disney, or High School Musical. Whatever. Retards. No one gives a shit. People are still going to watch Disney stuff, even with her in it, despite her posing for nude pictures that intentionally or unintentionally make it to the public. People need to quit acting like being seen nude publicly is such a horrible detestable thing. “Oh my god, we’re traumatized because we’ve seen her naked now!!” Fucking prudes!

    …So…umm…where are the rest of the nude pics of her?

    #46 | Comment by Pyronuc — September 7, 2007 @ 2:57 am

  47. I don’t know if she knows Kung Fu, but I’d love to see her box.

    #47 | Comment by Smiley — September 7, 2007 @ 4:31 am

  48. Man, she must feel really bad, knowing that every perv on the net must have seen the pictures. If you’re reading Vanessa, don’t be ashamed, you have a great body wich deserves to be fucked. Hard.

    #48 | Comment by furtivman — September 7, 2007 @ 5:32 am

  49. More pics:
    http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/15257585.html
    they aren’t nudes though, only sexy poses in undies.

    #49 | Comment by UnAimed — September 7, 2007 @ 6:34 am

  50. i was right..
    haha =)

    my superior instincts prevail once again.

    #50 | Comment by yawn — September 7, 2007 @ 9:02 am

  51. WOOHOOO……FAPTASTIC!!!!

    #51 | Comment by PoontangPieEater — September 7, 2007 @ 9:46 am

  52. Looks like a Jessica Biel type scandal. Remember when she wanted out of the WB contract to get away from 7th Heaven to do edgier stuff? Why else would her OR her world-famous boyfriend “leak” these? It was intentional. She wanted out of her Disney contract, and according to Wikipedia, she got it.

    #52 | Comment by Faptastic — September 7, 2007 @ 11:14 am

  53. Gotta say……..awesome……..

    #53 | Comment by FapTastic — September 7, 2007 @ 2:48 pm

  54. LAWL

    DISNEY FTW!!!!

    #54 | Comment by Spawn — September 7, 2007 @ 4:30 pm

  55. poor dumb horny Vanessa.

    When will celebs learn that naked photos of them will always appear on the internet?

    Hopefully, never.

    #55 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — September 7, 2007 @ 4:51 pm

  56. Jeez, think about all the skanks out there that have a nipslip or crotch shot…then think about this squeeky clean girl having every fan and pervert seeing her naked. And you know this all her boyfriends fault. The moron probably forwarded the pics to all his friends as soon as he got them.

    Ah well, I’m not complaining. These pics gave me the best three minutes I’ve had all week.

    #56 | Comment by The Pope — September 7, 2007 @ 5:34 pm

  57. i heard she had taken more naked pic including her in the bath tub blowing kisses to the camera fone

    #57 | Comment by mr shoe — September 7, 2007 @ 10:38 pm

  58. i love the internet. so much. and its things like this that only reinforce that idea.

    #58 | Comment by bow chicka bow wow — September 7, 2007 @ 10:59 pm

  59. I think this is the first time that fag Zac Efron saw a girl naked.

    #59 | Comment by Jack Mayhoffer — September 7, 2007 @ 11:24 pm

  60. what the hell is wrong with zac to not stay interested in the first place(gay perhaps?)

    i thought she took all the pics with her phone and its sitting next to the bag…

    #60 | Comment by a person — September 7, 2007 @ 11:45 pm

  61. So when are the Jamie Lynn Spears pics coming out?
    (Hopefully before she gets knocked up)

    #61 | Comment by Dean — September 7, 2007 @ 11:59 pm

  62. I got one better its Hi-Res and its been fixed. I need some where to post it. It looks a lot better.

    #62 | Comment by KtW Tupac — September 8, 2007 @ 1:31 am

  63. OMG, a girl who i thought was so hot, but was too innocent to do these kinda things in my mind did this shit? im not sure if i should be disgusted or… 😀

    #63 | Comment by Jon — September 8, 2007 @ 2:09 am

  64. So, this passes for hot now?

    #64 | Comment by thefilthelement — September 8, 2007 @ 2:17 am

  65. 61, didn’t JLS get knocked up (& aborted) already?

    #65 | Comment by tool — September 8, 2007 @ 3:48 am

  66. Looks like Baby V wants to make her Baby(Zac) come back, and come back again.

    Anyone think she looks 13 or 14 now?

    #66 | Comment by StillHidingMyName — September 8, 2007 @ 9:04 am

  67. apparently now vanessa is claiming she was 16 when the pictures were taken … interesting.

    #67 | Comment by DoctorofStyle — September 8, 2007 @ 12:23 pm

  68. i cant be leave u u were my favorite actor

    #68 | Comment by sahya — September 8, 2007 @ 1:30 pm

  69. Where does she claim she was 16?

    I’ve heard a few people say this in various blog comments but can’t find any real evidence this is true.

    Don’t want the “to catch a predator” guy kicking in my door so I need to know if these are “legal”.

    #69 | Comment by zleet — September 8, 2007 @ 1:34 pm

  70. Disney could not have wished for better publicity for its High School Musical franchise. Now that this has been on the news and in the papers everywhere, people who never watched HSM 1 or 2 will first try to find the picture on the internet, which should not be very hard; then watch the reruns and eagerly await HSM 3. And our little nude girl will be in it and probably get a higher salary. This was/is publicity that money cannot buy. I for one don’t thinkshe wants out of her contract. Perhaps eventually down the road, but for now Disney will keep her in its stable. And make a lot of money off her.

    #70 | Comment by Andre — September 8, 2007 @ 10:06 pm

  71. I found photos of the nude Vanessa Hudgens @ http://www.BecomingAPUA.com

    #71 | Comment by Anferny — September 8, 2007 @ 10:24 pm

  72. I think it’s bullshit that Disney made her apologize for something that was obviously supposed to remain private.

    Unless she leaked the pictures herself or something.

    #72 | Comment by Seriously — September 8, 2007 @ 10:48 pm

  73. i know there were more nude pics then that one i know about ther three undie pics and the head shot ones but there subpose to be more nude pics some where likher in a bath tub blowin kisses tot he cam phone i read it somewhere

    #73 | Comment by Smith — September 8, 2007 @ 11:11 pm

  74. do not click on the site whore at #71.

    Instead, use his name URL for evil.

    #74 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — September 9, 2007 @ 12:22 am

  75. She definitely doesn’t look like what she does now, and her necklace says ‘Justin’ on it, I believe.
    http://dontlinkthis.net/movies/hires/vanessahudgens/pages/image3.html

    Just something I noticed.

    #75 | Comment by Hmm — September 9, 2007 @ 12:52 am

  76. Err..never mind. Not quite sure what that necklace says. Not Justin…

    #76 | Comment by Hmm — September 9, 2007 @ 12:54 am

  77. Can we have a retake of this? The left one is not very clear…

    #77 | Comment by u4me — September 9, 2007 @ 1:33 am

  78. I know it’s a bit sad but I looked at a bunch of other pictures from a fansite to see if I could work out when they (nude) had been taken.

    The closest match seemed to be from August this year when she was in New York appearing on stuff like Regis as her hair was roughly the correct length.

    Seriously I need to get a life.

    #78 | Comment by Zleet — September 9, 2007 @ 8:28 am

  79. owned. (ps. zac efron ftw)

    #79 | Comment by sole1 — September 9, 2007 @ 7:54 pm

  80. Wow, this is 100% yum! Best way to bring down High school Musical – hate that movie.

    ^^^ 79. No, Zac efron does not ftw. That dude must’ve been gay if he started to loose interest on Vanessa.

    #80 | Comment by JM — September 10, 2007 @ 11:10 am

  81. That Dannon water bottle on the right looks hugemongous.

    #81 | Comment by huge — September 10, 2007 @ 4:10 pm

  82. I like her even more now that I know she was the girl in that Old Navy commercial.

    #82 | Comment by The Pope — September 10, 2007 @ 5:42 pm

  83. The uncensored photos can be found on that sucks500 site.

    #83 | Comment by marty gras — September 11, 2007 @ 1:40 am

  84. This article: http://tinyurl.com/2dr9o3 says “Hudgens had emailed photos to the Drake and Josh actor a couple of years ago, before she was famous, the source says. ” A couple of years ago, she was 16, so that makes all copies of this illegal, at least in the US…. Doesn’t it?

    #84 | Comment by Rubert Murdoch — September 13, 2007 @ 9:45 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *