KIM KARDASHIAN

I haven’t seen her sextape but i heard it’s almost as bad as Keeley Hazell’s. Saw her on E! a coupla times so i know she’s got big boobs (WIN). And whaddayaknow! She went out and did a Playboy shoot so why watch some bad sextape for the goods when you can now see her bunny mag spread!

WIN.

16 thoughts on “KIM KARDASHIAN

  1. I liken Playboy photoshoots to Michael Bay films: hot chicks, too much style, and not enough nudity.

    There’s more jiggle factor in the movie. But I think Kim’s better suited for porn than anything else. Like Paris she can’t sing, dance, act, or do anything as a human being. But at least she has great T&A.

    #1 | Comment by shirizaki — October 27, 2007 @ 7:28 am

  2. you can find the Kim K sex tape for free.

    like 4 different versions …

    http://www.shufuni.com/search?q=kim+k

    #2 | Comment by adsf — October 27, 2007 @ 8:29 am

  3. It looks like she has shaved since the sextape. And I don’t mean her legs.

    #3 | Comment by frankthedolphin — October 27, 2007 @ 8:44 am

  4. woah! wait a minute! was this post always here!? im in going crazy??

    oh well. she’s definitely made of WIN!

    #4 | Comment by Xan — October 27, 2007 @ 10:17 pm

  5. OK, now I’ve heard of this girl and her sister, but who the hell are they? Are they another hollywood tartlett famous for being famous?

    Also, isn’t her last name like one of the Star Trek Villians or something?

    #5 | Comment by MacDaddy — October 28, 2007 @ 1:08 am

  6. ^^^
    lol, i know right?

    but i think there grandfather was one of the lawyers that defended O.J.. and i think there father is an actor maybe. i dont know, nor do i care. she’s a hot tart. end of story.

    #6 | Comment by Xan — October 28, 2007 @ 1:28 am

  7. If you are going to fuck on film and sell that, what is the point in being shy for Playboy?
    At least it isn’t as lame as the Jenny Jones or Landers sisters’ show-nothing pictorials.

    #7 | Comment by tool — October 28, 2007 @ 3:11 pm

  8. She’s great. I don’t really know why anyone is famous, so the back story is irrelevant. Dark hair, huge jugs, huge ass, slutty, that’s all I need. Fantastic.

    #8 | Comment by Kewtr — October 28, 2007 @ 4:32 pm

  9. someone needs to tell this spoiled skank that it’s okay to skip dessert once in a while.

    and skipping lunch every now and then might not be a bad idea either.

    srsly if this chick’s ass gets any bigger, a team of climbers is gonna try to conquer the summit.

    #9 | Comment by AngelBaby — October 28, 2007 @ 5:13 pm

  10. ^^^

    dont hate AB.

    …dont HAte.

    #10 | Comment by Xan — October 28, 2007 @ 5:17 pm

  11. ^^^
    it’s not hatin if it’s all truth.

    #11 | Comment by AngelBaby — October 28, 2007 @ 5:19 pm

  12. ^^^
    Lets see your skinny ass

    #12 | Comment by V — October 29, 2007 @ 5:30 am

  13. Totally agree with #7.

    Then again, Playboy is a bore anyway. It’s a mag that wants to be “classy” but there’s really nothing classy about gawking at naked chics. There’s nothing wrong with gawking but, Playboy wants to pretend it’s some elite social event when it’s really just hormones.

    #13 | Comment by Bender — October 29, 2007 @ 6:08 pm

  14. She’s a little old for this crowd, isn’t she? What we need are her little sisters “Going Wild”

    #14 | Comment by Pwnt — October 30, 2007 @ 8:57 am

  15. Wow, Kim K really sucks at modeling. No wonder why nobody gives a shit about her.

    And she needed to show off more of that fake ass of hers.

    #15 | Comment by Tony — November 3, 2007 @ 8:33 am

  16. too bad pic #4 ‘disappeared’

    #16 | Comment by Taco — November 3, 2007 @ 11:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *