22 thoughts on “Well…

  1. That sure is one big ass photo. And it looks like her image consultants missed out on this shot before letting it go on print.

    First comment hah!

    #1 | Comment by RaYz — September 16, 2003 @ 10:22 pm

  2. I’m up to the nose now on that download. Big ASS photo.

    Dial-up connections suck balls. Majorly.

    #2 | Comment by RaYz — September 16, 2003 @ 10:26 pm

  3. i actually have 5 more of these huge ass pics of her but at about 900+k apiece, it’ll probably rape my bandwidth if i put them all up.

    #3 | Comment by Justin — September 16, 2003 @ 10:46 pm

  4. Those are some fine ass pores!

    #4 | Comment by bligityblah — September 17, 2003 @ 1:32 am

  5. Justin, you should be good on bandwidth. Feel free to stick them up.

    #5 | Comment by pottedmeat — September 17, 2003 @ 2:28 am

  6. updated!

    mmm pores…

    #6 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 3:28 am

  7. I have only one word that can describe this post:

    "O_O"

    Thank you.

    #7 | Comment by thefelinepunk — September 17, 2003 @ 5:54 am

  8. The only one I’ve looked at yet is the first one – and you can see the reflection of the lamp in her left eye (the one on the right.)

    fucking sweet.

    #8 | Comment by ricochet — September 17, 2003 @ 7:44 am

  9. whoa, amazing pics… thanks!

    #9 | Comment by cujo — September 17, 2003 @ 7:53 am

  10. she has a mark above her lip on teh right, seh has peach fuz and u can see the reflection of the umbrella lighty thing photographers use in her eye, pretty cool

    #10 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — September 17, 2003 @ 7:59 am

  11. I think i have to go get myself a 25" screen to fit that huge ass picture as my wallpaper.

    Rape. Rape. Rape. Bandwidth i mean.

    #11 | Comment by RaYz — September 17, 2003 @ 8:22 am

  12. rapist!

    i think i fell in love with jennifer connelly when i first saw the rocketeer. i was too young to remember her in labyrinth. anyhow, she somehow got real ugly (in real life) after she did a beautiful mind (did anyone see her at the oscars that year? yeugh..) but now she’s hot again so all is good.

    please dont get all skinny again jennifer.

    #12 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 10:01 am

  13. I think she got her boobs reduced.

    #13 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — September 17, 2003 @ 11:09 am

  14. breast reduction is the work of the devil.

    i miss full figured jennifer connelly.

    🙁

    #14 | Comment by Justin — September 17, 2003 @ 11:21 am

  15. Jennifer Connelly is teh hot! mmm i have a new wallpaper

    #15 | Comment by MyKe — September 17, 2003 @ 12:20 pm

  16. ‘Nuff pores. Gimme huge ass pics of teh boobies.

    Boobies bounce!

    #16 | Comment by RaYz — September 17, 2003 @ 4:47 pm

  17. I think Ms. Connelly is one of the most nicest looking women in showbiz.

    But I just saw Requiem for a Dream…and now all thoughts of Ms. Connelly bring with them images of old women receiving EST and young pretty boys’s arms rotting off.

    #17 | Comment by Seriously — September 17, 2003 @ 11:47 pm

  18. Um…

    The moral of that story is don’t see Requiem for a Dream, kids.

    Stay in school. Brush and floss after every meal.

    #18 | Comment by Seriously — September 17, 2003 @ 11:50 pm

  19. I know that of which you speak.

    #19 | Comment by Seriously — September 18, 2003 @ 4:06 am

  20. "when i think of jennifer connelly, i think of "ASS TO ASS!" "

    Ditto.

    A friend saw the edited version on Tee-Vee the other day. I made him re-watch it in unedited form, he thanked me very much. Now that I think about it I can’t remember if you even see her boobs in that movie? Do you see her boobs in any movie?

    #20 | Comment by bill — September 18, 2003 @ 5:29 am

  21. when i think of jennifer connelly, i think of "ASS TO ASS!"

    (hopefully you saw the unrated cut seriously)

    #21 | Comment by Justin — September 18, 2003 @ 12:09 pm

  22. _Some Girls_ is another early JC flick that is pretty decent for… er… ‘reading’ purposes.

    #22 | Comment by Steampunk — March 21, 2005 @ 1:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *