buy me

Posted on by

click

Update: Haha. Ebay took down the auction right after it ended. Here’s a cached copy of the page. The final bid ended up being for US$15.50.

Here are some of the comments that were left about the auction:

————————–

Question from: nxxxxxxxxxxxxxg
GREAT AUCTION, BUT i CNA’T HELP ASKING FOR PICS OF THE EX GIRLFRIEND!!!

Question from: oxxxxxxxxxxe
I was interested in these undergarments…  Have they been washed since you had them?  Do they still possibly have female juices on them? and how is the smell? If possible, could you send me a pic of the exgirlfriend in question?

Question from: ixxxxxxxxxt
you are such a FREAK Justin. but i like it.

Question from: txxxxxxxxx1
You must be a loser. How insecure of you to sell your girlfriends panties on the internet. This is a lame attempt to get back at her. You must have a little dick or something. The most pathetic part is how you spilled your guts in the description. That was real weak. You aren’t even a man. You need help son.

Question from: txxxx1
do they have a smell to them? Can you tell she wore them or are the clean & new?

Question from: txxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxg!
Do these panties still smell like a smelly pussy?

Question from: hxxxxxxxxxxxxxxf
ROFL…hahaha!!! This is the funniest auction I have ever seen man. Fricken women, the axis of evil I tell ya! anyways, cheers from a fellow Michigander…and no, I wasn’t the dude that had her…never seen those panties…at least not ON a chick.

Question from: rxxxx8
any stains or oders?

————————–

You guys are sickos!

94 thoughts on “buy me”

  1. Any evidence of SPS on those?

    Bro, thats nasty. Although I hear there’s a big market for that shit in Japan.

    #1 | Comment by AnotherOne — February 3, 2004 @ 7:59 pm

  2. That’s a very reasonable price. But the SPS concerns me.

    #2 | Comment by ocho — February 3, 2004 @ 8:01 pm

  3. that’s hilarious. I have a question though: have they been washed, or is "teh stank" still on them?

    #3 | Comment by kromekoran — February 3, 2004 @ 8:30 pm

  4. tempting…but no.

    #4 | Comment by connect n0w — February 3, 2004 @ 8:48 pm

  5. wow i thought the scorned woman got pissed… heh

    #5 | Comment by tonguey — February 3, 2004 @ 9:04 pm

  6. Priceless!!!

    #6 | Comment by Alejandro — February 3, 2004 @ 9:20 pm

  7. Sweet. I’m gonna have to shamelessly steal that idea.

    #7 | Comment by Kei — February 3, 2004 @ 9:22 pm

  8. i thought ebay banned the selling of used underwear because of the obvious completely disgusting qualities of such an auction. I give it a day or 2 before it is pulled off ebay.

    but it is funny.

    #8 | Comment by kvl — February 3, 2004 @ 9:22 pm

  9. do they have any skid marks in them?

    #9 | Comment by P. Orno Rocks — February 3, 2004 @ 9:23 pm

  10. have you told her? please tell her .. so we can laugh at her ..

    #10 | Comment by Josh — February 3, 2004 @ 9:31 pm

  11. haha that has definitely made my day *lmao*

    #11 | Comment by [nix] — February 3, 2004 @ 9:41 pm

  12. I’m going to win the auction and then re-auction as winning it from the guy who owns this site and then someone else can win it and then re-auction it…hahaha i’m retarded…i quit

    #12 | Comment by ryan — February 3, 2004 @ 9:42 pm

  13. yea that is pretty funny.

    #13 | Comment by Will — February 3, 2004 @ 9:52 pm

  14. this would be more effective if there was a picture of teh little skank to go with it…

    just an idea.

    #14 | Comment by sexcrzdwezl — February 3, 2004 @ 9:57 pm

  15. Hahahha, that’s fucking funny. I’d buy them just for funny’s sake, but at almost five bucks already? Fuck that!

    #15 | Comment by Bubba — February 3, 2004 @ 10:16 pm

  16. I’ll pass.

    #16 | Comment by ASL — February 3, 2004 @ 10:38 pm

  17. I think those are YOUR panties, Justin. You nasty little freak. Oh yeah, LOST IN TRANSLATION came out on DVD today, everyone go buy/rent it. Mmmm… Scarlett

    #17 | Comment by Dex — February 3, 2004 @ 11:10 pm

  18. Oh, Justin, whats the shipping costs on those stanky undies?

    #18 | Comment by Dex — February 3, 2004 @ 11:11 pm

  19. Dex,
    Everyone knows that Justin’s panties always are silk ones from Fredericks!

    #19 | Comment by bligityblah — February 3, 2004 @ 11:20 pm

  20. C’mon, Justin. It’s been a LONG TIME now. Funny, yes…but well past the shelf life of this joke, he? If you’d done it last year, I’d have understood…

    #20 | Comment by RedEye — February 3, 2004 @ 11:22 pm

  21. RedEye dont be a tool…Its never too late to be disagreeable toward an ex, especially if its funny. Its your right as their ex to dislike them. -thx

    #21 | Comment by Joe — February 3, 2004 @ 11:27 pm

  22. uhhmmm… strange. A bit too strange.

    Funny, but strange…

    #22 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 3, 2004 @ 11:32 pm

  23. This is the funniest shit since you took those pictures of that thora birch girl in class. I will steal this idea one day!!

    #23 | Comment by superlurker — February 3, 2004 @ 11:39 pm

  24. Post a pic of your ex-girlfriend and I’ll think about it.

    Seriously.

    #24 | Comment by jobe — February 3, 2004 @ 11:46 pm

  25. do you think anyone would buy them?

    #25 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 4, 2004 @ 1:47 am

  26. she’s gonna be soooo mad at you…

    but that’s funny as hell. if my ex tried to sell my panties online, I’d be flattered. Well, only if someone bought them.

    hehehehehehe

    #26 | Comment by TheOtherAmy — February 4, 2004 @ 1:50 am

  27. AWESOME.

    (That girl has bad taste in panties.)

    #27 | Comment by thess — February 4, 2004 @ 2:23 am

  28. What’s with the ripping on smileys? I like that kinda stuff in a ‘cornball’ way?

    I have a pair of boxers with a HUGE smiley face in the center. I think it’s funny. Not that I really wear them…or certainly not on a date.

    #28 | Comment by smash — February 4, 2004 @ 3:14 am

  29. Yeah, you really do need to address the ‘stank’ issue. Do they have that schmegma stain on them that you seem to induce in your lady folk friends? I’m afraid I’d need to see another photo of the inside to verify front and back stainage.

    If they’re stained would I then pay more?
    … probably!

    #29 | Comment by dr.einstein — February 4, 2004 @ 3:31 am

  30. I have a black thong with a smiley face winking in the corner…I have nothin against the smiley face race! Ok, that was lame… but still. I dont know what Im saying. This site just entertains me when Im bored.

    #30 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 4, 2004 @ 4:28 am

  31. "you should’ve really dumped her the day she took her clothes off and you saw the stupid smiley face panties."
    -Sarah

    I agree.
    But I commend Justin for a great sales pitch. I had to stop myself from bidding just for the hell of it.

    #31 | Comment by JaNe DoE — February 4, 2004 @ 5:21 am

  32. HAHAHAHA!! Brutally funny!!

    I’ll bet she sues you.

    #32 | Comment by grud — February 4, 2004 @ 10:17 am

  33. Yeah that is pretty nasty. I hope you cleaned the do do and vagina stains from the undies.

    #33 | Comment by stupidman — February 4, 2004 @ 10:28 am

  34. LOL that is hysterical. You should include a picture of her too for all those freaks. Could triple your money!

    #34 | Comment by gingis — February 4, 2004 @ 10:46 am

  35. dude, I have that underwear in like 5 different colors. no smileys for me.

    #35 | Comment by stacia — February 4, 2004 @ 11:07 am

  36. I think it will sell better if you attach the girl’s pic 🙂

    #36 | Comment by duhhh — February 4, 2004 @ 12:07 pm

  37. Hahahahaha defamaing exes via the Internet is a lotta fun. 😀

    #37 | Comment by Becca — February 4, 2004 @ 12:20 pm

  38. you should’ve really dumped her the day she took her clothes off and you saw the stupid smiley face panties.

    its fucking hilarious though – and gives me all sorts of evil ideas for stuff that belongs to my ex’s.

    #38 | Comment by sarah — February 4, 2004 @ 12:59 pm

  39. im thinkign about STDs

    #39 | Comment by dammit — February 4, 2004 @ 2:45 pm

  40. Hey now, what’s with all the smiley face hatin’? If my girlfriend wore a pair of panties like that, I’d think it was cute.
    That doesn’t mean I’m going to buy a used pair off of Ebay, but I’m just sayin’ is all.

    #40 | Comment by Harrison — February 4, 2004 @ 3:23 pm

  41. Why are the teeny boppers the header of your site…

    #41 | Comment by idog — February 4, 2004 @ 3:28 pm

  42. thats nothing. if you want REALLY GROSS, check out http://www.Ebanned.com. it has all the stuff on it that Ebay wont allow. HAHAHAHA.

    #42 | Comment by hedgie — February 4, 2004 @ 3:55 pm

  43. Justin, I can only hope this serves some sort of therapeutic benefit for you.

    Because you really ought to let this go.

    (Sorry if this goes against the whole, "everyone lick Justin’s ass and tell him he’s a genius" vibe going on.)

    #43 | Comment by Amy — February 4, 2004 @ 5:42 pm

  44. Amy – I didn’t give approval or disapproval. I’m neutral. 🙂

    #44 | Comment by smash — February 4, 2004 @ 6:13 pm

  45. I really wish I hadn’t seen that post about ebanned.com. I feel very unclean now.

    #45 | Comment by ocho — February 4, 2004 @ 6:28 pm

  46. Man, Danielle never wore smiley face panties before… I’m kinda wishing I never broke up with her now. My favorite kind of panties are the cute smiley face kind. Oh well, I need a shoulder to cry on, so I’m gonna find Rider Strong and seek consolement from him… ***sobs***

    #46 | Comment by Ben Savage — February 4, 2004 @ 7:00 pm

  47. Amy wrote –

    "Justin, I can only hope this serves some sort of therapeutic benefit for you.

    Because you really ought to let this go.

    (Sorry if this goes against the whole, "everyone lick Justin’s ass and tell him he’s a genius" vibe going on.)

    Posted by Amy – 5:42pm February 4, 2004"

    I believe he IS letting it go – at $4.99 as I last checked. If you think that anyone agreeing with this, must only be doing so to kiss Justin’s ass, then you’re more delusional than I already thought.

    She cheated. He’s selling panties. Wtf is so freakin’ wrong about this?

    If it were me, there would be nude pics of me f-ing her online, and I’d be selling the prints, and throwing the panties in as an afterthought.

    He’s being sensible if you ask me.

    #47 | Comment by sexcrwezl — February 4, 2004 @ 7:20 pm

  48. Still STDS

    #48 | Comment by dammit — February 4, 2004 @ 7:36 pm

  49. …if you ask me.

    I actually wan’t.

    I addressed Justin, a person I clearly like and respect. This is why I said "I can only hope this serves some sort of therapeutic benefit for you."

    Look up the word "therapeutic", and then learn why you’re a dumbass.

    You are not only licking his ass, you’re also now acting as his self-appointed spokesperson.

    And if a girl ever does cheat on you, and you have nude pictures of her, you really ought to let the fact that your dick was inside her to be punishment enough.

    Every single time Justin has posted about his ex, you start telling him he should use her name, or post up some pictures. You are a sad, pathetic little Internet Creature.

    #49 | Comment by Amy — February 4, 2004 @ 7:51 pm

  50. Gah! Amy’s rough! errr…but I hate cheaters and would do anything to fuck with them just because it hurts to get cheated on by someone you care about and in my insane opinion, cheaters should fucking die, but eh whatever. Also, I don’t know…maybe some people let go of things. I seem to remember everything that Ive ever disliked about anyone when I think about it and I don’t let it go. AHHH I need counselling than I guess but whatever cause im not going to get it so :oP Cheaters suck and there is no letting go!

    #50 | Comment by Joe — February 4, 2004 @ 8:14 pm

  51. http://www.ebanned.net/cgi-bin/auction/auction.cgi?category=movie6&item=1076360714

    im in love

    #51 | Comment by boreddude — February 4, 2004 @ 8:18 pm

  52. amy said "And if a girl ever does cheat on you, and you have nude pictures of her, you really ought to let the fact that your dick was inside her to be punishment enough."

    DAMN WHAT A BURN. I’ll have to remember that one.

    #52 | Comment by stacia — February 4, 2004 @ 8:25 pm

  53. remind me not to piss off amy or stacia !

    #53 | Comment by hedgie — February 4, 2004 @ 9:44 pm

  54. Amy pleads,

    "I actually wan’t."

    I’m going to assume, for your own misguided benefit, that you meant "won’t", however those amongst us with a more Freudian disposition would assume you got a sick attraction to me since the "a" key and "o" key aren’t even in the same neighborhood. Nevertheless, lets keep those nasty little thoughts to ourselves, shall we? But I digress.

    On to my actual point, my dyslexic little slut.

    While I’m busy looking up "therapeutic", and trying to comprehend how this even remotely relates to MY POST, since there’s nothing about what I said that even addressed that particular point, you might want to look up "spokesperson". You obviously don’t know the meaning of either of those "big words", since it is quite clear even to the mentally handicapped (that would be you, Amy, and your retarded brood), that I was stating my OWN opinion and that by definition doesn’t allow me to "speak" for "anyone" else.

    "And if a girl ever does cheat on you, and you have nude pictures of her, you really ought to let the fact that your dick was inside her to be punishment enough."

    Should it happen – I won’t. I feel sharing it with the rest of the world would be infinitely more "therapeutic". But thanks for the tip.

    "Every single time Justin has posted about his ex, you start telling him he should use her name, or post up some pictures. You are a sad, pathetic little Internet Creature."

    I hadn’t noticed, however, I take comfort in the fact that you hang on my every pathetic post. I love you too, you little stalker.

    Look. It’s quite obvious, even to the most gullible amongst us, that you’ve clearly cheated on your previous boyfriends and thus, you feel a certain kinship to this little bitch. While this fact is hardly surprising, I would suggest you keep your incredible low moral and ethical standards to yourself and hope you don’t pass them on to your handicapped offspring.

    I’d hate to have to pay any more taxes than I already do, to keep you and those snot noses of yours on welfare.

    #54 | Comment by sexcrzdwzl — February 4, 2004 @ 11:06 pm

  55. Can’t we all just get along… motherfuckers?

    #55 | Comment by Dex — February 4, 2004 @ 11:24 pm

  56. wow… now im lost

    #56 | Comment by tonguey — February 4, 2004 @ 11:36 pm

  57. "I actually wan’t."

    Actually, it was a slip of the "s" key. The word was intended to be "wasn’t".

    Everything else you said — completely wrong. I’m pretty sure. I skimmed the bulk of it because you bore me.

    #57 | Comment by Amy — February 4, 2004 @ 11:41 pm

  58. ah yes, the joys of lint

    http://www.ebanned.net/cgi-bin/auction/auction.cgi?category=other4&item=1076384110

    #58 | Comment by tonguey — February 4, 2004 @ 11:53 pm

  59. 😀

    Untamable and out of control females are awesome.

    #59 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 4, 2004 @ 11:57 pm

  60. http://www.ebanned.net/cgi-bin/auction/auction.cgi?category=other4&item=1076384110

    that lint looks like amy’s vagina.

    #60 | Comment by sexcrzdwezl — February 5, 2004 @ 1:50 am

  61. hey now.. why do we have to start with the potshots?

    Justin was funny, yet tasteless… Amy, being female understood where he was coming from while understanding the tastelessness in hurting another human being. since justin is her friend, she gave him leeway for being almost as insensitive as his ex-cheating girlfriend. It’s therapeutic, and Amy doesn’t sound like a cheater to me.

    #61 | Comment by jb — February 5, 2004 @ 3:39 am

  62. Ok, Justin, I have no life, please update FUBAR so I may be further entertained with something new.

    IM FUCKING BORED HERE!

    #62 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 5, 2004 @ 4:35 am

  63. http://www.mhff.ca/friday/fubar.gif

    #63 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 5, 2004 @ 4:44 am

  64. I have been cheated on by an ex. And for different reasons, which seemed like good and valid reasons at the time, took her back. Not once, but twice! How dumb is that? that was rhetorical, please don’t answer. But anyway, it happened again less than two years later. So now, we are done, separated, will soon seek divorce. She has no clue how to be faithful or know what true love is. I think being cheated on is one of the most painful experiences one can have. I would love to exact some revenge on her, but I have no nude pics of her, I deleted them because they disgusted me. Had i known about sites like revengeworld.com or this ebanned.com, i would have definitely acted upon my bitterness. But I guess I will have to either get over it, or be happy with the ideas that what comes around, goes around, and some day, she will get hers!

    #64 | Comment by scott — February 5, 2004 @ 10:46 am

  65. jb is right abt everything except that amy didnot need to take a shot at everyone finding it funny and calling it ass kissing. that was pretty unnecessary.

    #65 | Comment by whatever — February 5, 2004 @ 10:47 am

  66. http://www.ebanned.net/cgi-bin/auction/auction.cgi?category=extreme4&item=1076198252

    I almost puked when I saw that one. Not for people eatting food at the moment.

    #66 | Comment by stacia — February 5, 2004 @ 11:09 am

  67. there is no need to fuck with or punish people who cheat. because anyone who can actually DO that does’t understand or know how to experience a real, honest and healthy relationship. and that’s pretty much the worst thing i can think of in regards to love life.

    well… besides bad oral.

    #67 | Comment by lizzi — February 5, 2004 @ 12:11 pm

  68. they will, however, be able to have ridiculous amounts of sex without having to worry about becoming the slut they already are. someone needs to balance out the universe if god ain’t gonna do it.

    :::thumbs up, punishment:::

    #68 | Comment by jobe — February 5, 2004 @ 12:30 pm

  69. I refuse to be tricked into looking at nasty pictures.

    #69 | Comment by grud — February 5, 2004 @ 2:37 pm

  70. stacia, thats not even for people that aren’t eating at the moment…my god.

    #70 | Comment by Will — February 5, 2004 @ 2:42 pm

  71. **stacia, thats not even for people that aren’t eating at the moment…my god.**

    It’s yer own fault for scrolling down. I read the title of the auction and that was enough for me to close the window.

    #71 | Comment by Kei — February 5, 2004 @ 3:17 pm

  72. get over it lol

    #72 | Comment by dammit — February 5, 2004 @ 4:19 pm

  73. Horrible. I didn’t even realise you were trying to achieve a new low in your life, Justin, but intentional or not, you did it BIGTIME.

    #73 | Comment by jackass — February 5, 2004 @ 4:46 pm

  74. someone’s gotta balance out the universe.

    #74 | Comment by jobe — February 5, 2004 @ 7:08 pm

  75. haha! a new wave of Ebanned.com Devotees ! i for one dont look at it. too gross for me.

    #75 | Comment by hedgie — February 5, 2004 @ 8:02 pm

  76. why oh why did I click that link…

    #76 | Comment by bligityblah — February 5, 2004 @ 9:01 pm

  77. the link is…for a tampon…just incase anyone who did not want to click on the link.

    Update man update!!

    #77 | Comment by merr — February 5, 2004 @ 9:09 pm

  78. I almost puked when I saw that one. Not for people eatting food at the moment.

    Posted by stacia – 11:09am February 5, 2004

    You’ve ruined Wendy’s for me..

    #78 | Comment by Eric — February 5, 2004 @ 11:15 pm

  79. Just pretend it’s ketchup! =D

    #79 | Comment by jonny — February 5, 2004 @ 11:52 pm

  80. It probably is.

    #80 | Comment by Dex — February 5, 2004 @ 11:55 pm

  81. Can’t shake the craving for trout flavored french fries…

    #81 | Comment by sexcrzwzl — February 6, 2004 @ 3:31 am

  82. Goddamn, just to think, I just looked at that bloody pussy, and it didn’t even phase me. Now if it were a midgets pussy…

    #82 | Comment by jay-dot p-dot — February 6, 2004 @ 6:02 am

  83. weird.

    Now, FUCKING UPDATE!

    #83 | Comment by kinkiekitten — February 6, 2004 @ 7:15 am

  84. hilary duff’s elusive belly button! has anyone ever seen a picture where it was exposed? i have been through hundreds and can’t find one. let me know!

    #84 | Comment by ryan — February 6, 2004 @ 7:34 am

  85. Please, J. Update! Update! This thread is TIRED. We’ve got sexcrzdwzl doing his best to flex his lexigraphic muscles on Amy for no particulary good reason. And beyond that we’ve devolved to nasty ebanned links.

    #85 | Comment by RedEye — February 6, 2004 @ 11:46 am

  86. he’s trying to plug his ebay auction. be kind.

    #86 | Comment by stacia — February 6, 2004 @ 11:59 am

  87. Hohoho, fries, yum!

    #87 | Comment by Bubba — February 6, 2004 @ 12:39 pm

  88. wait a minute, now that’s just not right!

    how come nobody made the cheap plug before?

    #88 | Comment by vhw — February 6, 2004 @ 12:53 pm

  89. 15.50 for a pair of used underwear! Alright Justin.

    #89 | Comment by AKA Postal — February 6, 2004 @ 5:45 pm

  90. Ryan… here is a picture with hilary duff’s belly button exposed… you’re welcome…

    http://www.taod.com/modules.php?name=gal&file=photo&a=16&p=523

    #90 | Comment by Juice — February 7, 2004 @ 1:22 am

  91. Why is everyone hating on Justin Timberlake? He did’nt know that Janet was going to be crazy and show her boob to the world!

    #91 | Comment by jennijustice21 — February 7, 2004 @ 7:15 am

  92. Jenni if you really believe that then I have a bridge to sell you. It’s big, orange, and in San Francisco.

    Thats not Hilary Duff btw.

    #92 | Comment by bligityblah — February 7, 2004 @ 9:25 pm

  93. it got pulled from ebay, just like i predicted when i posted earlier….i was the 8th or 9th post in this thread. i think its funny that ebay won’t let you seel weird stuff, but apparently ebay U.K. will still let you sell thats type of stuff, so used underwear buyers and sellers rejoice…as long as you live in cold wet england.

    i blame my being right in my predictin’ on peer pressure….and the drugs.

    #93 | Comment by kvl — February 8, 2004 @ 1:11 am

  94. nice auction.. cya losers

    #94 | Comment by blahblah — February 16, 2004 @ 1:56 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *