56 thoughts on “Scarlett Johansson”

  1. I love her.

    Nazi!

    #1 | Comment by bligityblah — May 31, 2004 @ 1:47 am

  2. first (?)

    hot damn.

    /Del Toro was here *whiplash*

    #2 | Comment by YBLalat — May 31, 2004 @ 1:49 am

  3. shewillbemybrideandiwillmakewildpassionatelovetoherbeforeIdie.

    the end?

    #3 | Comment by radish01001 — May 31, 2004 @ 1:49 am

  4. I agree she is a lovely girl… but somehow I think she is her best looking when she doesn’t try ala "Girl With a Pearl Earring". The glammed up Johansson doesn’t do it for me as much for some reason who knows maybe I am weird.

    #4 | Comment by ZenMoon7 — May 31, 2004 @ 1:49 am

  5. She’s really nice. I like her eyes. And how she’s natural and all that.

    #5 | Comment by adjustments — May 31, 2004 @ 1:51 am

  6. She still hasn’t found a decent hair style, that one makes her look like a white-trash hooker. And I’m not saying she ain’t cute, she is.

    #6 | Comment by Lock — May 31, 2004 @ 1:52 am

  7. she’s undeniably beautiful, but i *still* cannot believe that del toro hit that. ick.

    #7 | Comment by april — May 31, 2004 @ 1:53 am

  8. So mysteriously hot…

    #8 | Comment by Mike — May 31, 2004 @ 1:56 am

  9. Justin, you do requests?

    New: Alexa Vega (Raising Helen Premier)
    http://tinyurl.com/3gexz

    New: Emma Watson (Harry Potter Premiere)
    http://tinyurl.com/yqqhd

    #9 | Comment by YBLalat — May 31, 2004 @ 1:56 am

  10. PEDO!

    #10 | Comment by Justin — May 31, 2004 @ 1:58 am

  11. I don’t know who those two are but they look 15 to me! And mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmscarletmmmmmmmm

    #11 | Comment by Lee — May 31, 2004 @ 2:03 am

  12. she’s not that hot…get over it.

    PS – Neither is Avril

    #12 | Comment by DetWhat — May 31, 2004 @ 2:06 am

  13. Yep it’s official, after your post in the forums I now hope you die in a tragic cooking accident.

    #13 | Comment by bligityblah — May 31, 2004 @ 2:08 am

  14. Dude! You beat me to emailing you about it!
    and my first email as well! Oh well, might want to mention the mini gallery on the elle.com site for the fans out there too!
    Keep up the good work,
    Peace,
    RHLLT
    PS and yes i do own a copy of the elle, what scanner do you use? or can i ask where you got the pics?

    #14 | Comment by RedHotLoverLoverTone — May 31, 2004 @ 2:15 am

  15. Good goddamn, this girl is fast approaching "hottest chick on earth" status. Oof.

    #15 | Comment by dreezy — May 31, 2004 @ 2:15 am

  16. Oh yeah! watson rules…

    #16 | Comment by tom — May 31, 2004 @ 2:16 am

  17. Badass update, thanks man.

    #17 | Comment by DarckkorioN — May 31, 2004 @ 2:23 am

  18. Horrible pictures of Scarlett. Here is $1, get a new haircut. Get some more pics of that big-titty Lindsay Lohan.

    Box office for Mean Girls (still in theaters) $72 million. Box Office for Lost In Translation $40 million. Lohan wins again.

    #18 | Comment by Bob Patterson — May 31, 2004 @ 2:25 am

  19. i’ve had those higher res pics for about a month now. heh. i guess i just forgot to post them up (actually i thought i already had posted them up but apparently not), then i found the elle pics 2 days ago. held off on posting those because i thought they’d be reposts. but apparently not! but anyway, here they are now. i should really stop sitting on pics like that 😛

    #19 | Comment by Justin — May 31, 2004 @ 2:36 am

  20. Face, eyes? None of that is important when Scarlett’s sitting on my face…

    #20 | Comment by stonesoundjam — May 31, 2004 @ 2:45 am

  21. What?

    I’m 17 years old.

    /Referring to "Pedo!" accusation by Justin.

    #21 | Comment by YBLalat — May 31, 2004 @ 3:14 am

  22. justin, i remember a while back u posted a link to this one site that had funny as flash movies. i tried looking thru ur archive and i couldnt find it (blind), by any chance u could post it on here? cheers.

    #22 | Comment by j — May 31, 2004 @ 3:16 am

  23. scentless likey.

    scentless want sucky sucky.

    #23 | Comment by scentless — May 31, 2004 @ 3:20 am

  24. boobies so nice, id touch em twice

    #24 | Comment by Mr. Junky — May 31, 2004 @ 3:39 am

  25. Oh wow, I must be stupid, sure I’ve heard of her, but what exactly does she do? I must be living under a rock. :-\

    #25 | Comment by James Earl Jones — May 31, 2004 @ 4:18 am

  26. why must she always have short hair? she was so much better looking with the LONG hair.

    #26 | Comment by cronox2 — May 31, 2004 @ 4:28 am

  27. This girl despises boys her own age, despises guys like the majority of us. She said men don´t come good below thirty year old of age. She can have Benicio Del Toro as much as she want´s until her pussy rots. Fucking snot…

    #27 | Comment by Hyperion — May 31, 2004 @ 5:02 am

  28. GONE WITH THE WIND!… 😉

    #28 | Comment by http://www.pcpages.com/abyssal — May 31, 2004 @ 6:12 am

  29. I think this is a repost.

    #29 | Comment by Lone Bard — May 31, 2004 @ 8:24 am

  30. I am the Protect Emma Watson From Evil Men Brigade, she is FOURTEEN years old and should not be treated as a sex object, especially not by those older than her.
    Scarlett makes me go all green with jealousy 🙁

    #30 | Comment by Thalia — May 31, 2004 @ 9:13 am

  31. justin made a post a little while ago about hayden panettiere [i think]…i just have to say we will have to watch out for her, i think she’s going to pull a lohan…i made a little collage. I know she’s only 15, but who cares!

    #31 | Comment by ryan — May 31, 2004 @ 9:18 am

  32. Scarlett: Beat Angelina Jolie for best lips in hollywood?

    Yeah, she’s hot, but I can’t get over the fact that Benicio Del Toro made her "The Girl with the Pearl Necklace"

    UGLY DRUG TRAFFICKERS AWAY

    #32 | Comment by Rush Limbaugh — May 31, 2004 @ 10:15 am

  33. Bob, you can’t judge a celeb’s hotness or the quality of a movie on the basis of the movie’s profits. My prime example is of course Home Alone grossing $408,780,731 (inflation adjusted) but I could just of easily stuck Titanic ($774,918,846) in there to piss Justin off. However, since he’s become a bitter man and has started banning IP’s I guess I’ll just acknowledge Titanic’s greatness and throw a HAIL HITLER! in there while I’m at it.

    So Bob, I guess I’ll leave you with Malcolm-in-the-middle-with-tits and Macauley Caulkin. I’ll take Avril and Scarlett (bad hair and all). Oh yeah, and to back up the whole Mean Girls vs Lost in Translation:

    Lost in Translation Reviews
    vs.
    Mean Girls Reviews

    #33 | Comment by Lock — May 31, 2004 @ 10:23 am

  34. 1 – i am SO TOTALLY with Thalia on the emma watson deal… and it looks like we’re going to have to have the same campagne for hayden panettiere … guys, these young ladies are adorable, but bEyaCk ofF!
    2 – what movies has Scarlett been in? was she the chick in the family channel movie? or am i completely havin a ‘help me im blonde and lost moment’?
    3 – last but COMPLETELY not least…. NEVER EVER EVER will ANYONE in hollywood beat Angelina Jolie for the purrdiEst, sexIesT, goRegoOmouS lips in Hollywood! hers are au-natural and just beautiful!
    ps… did scarlett do the collegan(sp)?

    #34 | Comment by onederfool1 — May 31, 2004 @ 10:45 am

  35. Maybe its just me but I think Scarlett Johanson is rediculously plain, ugly even.

    #35 | Comment by senason — May 31, 2004 @ 11:01 am

  36. felt like a repost too but i checked and i never did have any of these files linked in any post 😮

    deva ju away!

    #36 | Comment by Justin — May 31, 2004 @ 11:07 am

  37. Thank you Justin. Every Scarlett update is the bomb.

    #37 | Comment by lindsay lohan is ugly — May 31, 2004 @ 11:17 am

  38. Am i the only one who thinks that Scarlett isn’t that hot? Sure she has a nice body and lovely large breasts, but her face doesnt really do anything for me.

    #38 | Comment by Bikit — May 31, 2004 @ 11:30 am

  39. scarlett is just alright for me..dont really feel her..u know that i mean?

    #39 | Comment by jareth — May 31, 2004 @ 11:54 am

  40. that i mean = what i mean
    typing error.

    #40 | Comment by jareth — May 31, 2004 @ 11:56 am

  41. Yeah, I don’t find Scarlett that attractive, either. And while we’re on the subject, Emma Watson is horribly, horribly WRONG for *at least* 3 years, probably even 4.

    On the other hand, that Hayden Panettiere chick isn’t half bad. In the end, I don’t think it really matters the age that much (to an extent!), but how they look at that age.

    Emma Watson is what, 13 or 14, and she looks 10. Scratch that, 8. This Hayden Panettiere girl on the other hand is 15, and looks 16, and in some states 17. Lindsay Lohan… well, she looks 21 because you can tell she gets wasted and raped often. "Look at me, I flaunt my titties like I just got them! Oh, wait, I did."

    #41 | Comment by JLP — May 31, 2004 @ 1:32 pm

  42. Oh, and just to clear things up… in my last post, I didn’t mean that if a chick were 10 and looked 16 it’d be alright, because it wouldn’t. Age does play a factor, it’s just that how old they *look* also does.

    The 38 year old British guy with the "Seconds until Emma turns 18" clock can now proceed to go and masturbate to Dakota Fanning.
    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0266824/

    #42 | Comment by JLP — May 31, 2004 @ 1:37 pm

  43. scarlett doesn’t look very hot in these pics…..

    #43 | Comment by Booyah — May 31, 2004 @ 1:43 pm

  44. Scarlett looks like a crack whore in those pics….

    #44 | Comment by Booyah — May 31, 2004 @ 1:48 pm

  45. pedo or not i agree with YBLalat..
    [b]SchoolYard Lurkers AWAY![/b]

    #45 | Comment by bah — May 31, 2004 @ 1:53 pm

  46. I find neither Lohan nor Johansson very attractive. I do like . . . what’s her name? . . . from Big Fish and Matchstick Men . . . quite a bit, though. Alison Loman, or something like that. As to Emma Watson — I have no problem with guys drooling over teens, but she looks kind of stupid to me, and that’s definitely a turn-off.

    #46 | Comment by Mastadge — May 31, 2004 @ 3:08 pm

  47. Alison Lohman away!

    #47 | Comment by Justin — May 31, 2004 @ 3:27 pm

  48. Gross. Alison Lohman looks like that kid in Pet Sematary after he comes back to life and slits Fred Munster’s achilles.

    See for yourself

    #48 | Comment by governor steve — May 31, 2004 @ 11:40 pm

  49. You know what’s frightening about Alison Lohman? The fact that she’s fucking 25 years old.

    #49 | Comment by dreezy — June 1, 2004 @ 1:17 am

  50. Anyone who has thinks about sex and dakota fanning in the same thought should be drawn and quartered and have his remains wrapped in elephant dung and flung into space.

    #50 | Comment by UncleMao — June 1, 2004 @ 1:35 am

  51. but her baby teeth turn me on so much!!

    j/k

    #51 | Comment by ryan — June 1, 2004 @ 7:16 am

  52. Who the fuck is Alison Lohman? She looks familiar but I cant think of anything shes been in.

    #52 | Comment by Lone Bard — June 1, 2004 @ 8:21 am

  53. shes from big fish, matchstick men, and white oleander if you saw any of those

    #53 | Comment by Rider of Lohman — June 1, 2004 @ 8:53 am

  54. i think that pet semetary kid is miko hughes, he was the "boys have a penis, girls have a vagina" kid from kindergarden "its not a tumor" cop…

    #54 | Comment by Joe — June 1, 2004 @ 10:42 am

  55. Scarlett or others.

    #55 | Comment by The lochness — June 2, 2004 @ 9:58 pm

  56. i’ve been reading a lot lately about scarlett and the fact is that she’s just one of the better young actrices at the time. I think she’s great and just perfect in lost in translation, i love that movie!!! You should all see it and you will think the same

    #56 | Comment by serena — June 30, 2004 @ 7:23 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *