IMO Amanda doesn’t look as good in glamour shots. Pictures that show her natural beauty are better.
I’m not a big fan of glamour shots anyway because it makes girls look like plastic replicas. Especially when they look hot without all the make-up and photo touch up.
#5 |
Comment
by BigBlueBalls — October 12, 2005 @
11:54 am
Nice one again. Agree with BigBlueBalls. She looks better in her regular shots.
#6 |
Comment
by Jack — October 12, 2005 @
11:58 am
No, no, and no.
She looks like a white shaq. Her eyes are so close together, it makes me dizzy trying to focus on pictures of her face. In fact, her eyes are SO close together that her right eye almost encroaches on nose territory.
Look at it closely… it’s like a sideways shannon doherty…
I have to say, she’s lookin’ pretty good here. The first out of the series has to be my favorite. The b/w is ok, but like everyone is saying – a little too fake.
I would like to see what she says too. I think I wouldn’t like her anymore if she said something like, her Christian morals tell her partying and drinking and doing drugs are evil. I would hate her forever!
#17 |
Comment
by sycros — October 12, 2005 @
1:08 pm
If there was a Mr. or Mrs. Independant, they wouldn’t be very independant, now would they?
#18 |
Comment
by michler — October 12, 2005 @
1:17 pm
Yawn
#19 |
Comment
by El Payo — October 12, 2005 @
1:31 pm
She looks like she has down syndrome in the last picture.
#20 |
Comment
by deez — October 12, 2005 @
1:46 pm
She’s beautiful. I’ve upgraded Amanda from Cute to Beautiful.
I’ve never seen What a Girl Wants. I’m expecting an insightful, well-thought out review after your first viewing.
#21 |
Comment
by Ruprecht Jones — October 12, 2005 @
2:01 pm
I agree with #14.
And I want some Mandy Moore. =(
#22 |
Comment
by wangdexian — October 12, 2005 @
4:16 pm
Crap, I meant #5.
#23 |
Comment
by wangdexian — October 12, 2005 @
4:17 pm
now can we get some pics of young celeb hotties (alba, biel, trachtenberg) who are actually hawt?
looking at bynes makes me wonder if there is an operation that can pull your eyes further apart, but seeing how your sockets are kinda set in your skull, i guess she’s SOL.
that’s one lucky puppy
(first)
#1 | Comment by marsgwar — October 12, 2005 @ 11:28 am
how is she attractive?
#2 | Comment by abcdefg — October 12, 2005 @ 11:42 am
quit pining for bynes
#3 | Comment by Big Ben — October 12, 2005 @ 11:43 am
bynes is the future
#4 | Comment by Justin — October 12, 2005 @ 11:44 am
IMO Amanda doesn’t look as good in glamour shots. Pictures that show her natural beauty are better.
I’m not a big fan of glamour shots anyway because it makes girls look like plastic replicas. Especially when they look hot without all the make-up and photo touch up.
#5 | Comment by BigBlueBalls — October 12, 2005 @ 11:54 am
Nice one again. Agree with BigBlueBalls. She looks better in her regular shots.
#6 | Comment by Jack — October 12, 2005 @ 11:58 am
No, no, and no.
She looks like a white shaq. Her eyes are so close together, it makes me dizzy trying to focus on pictures of her face. In fact, her eyes are SO close together that her right eye almost encroaches on nose territory.
Look at it closely… it’s like a sideways shannon doherty…
#7 | Comment by embus — October 12, 2005 @ 12:10 pm
I thought Kelly Clarkson was “miss independent”…
where’s mrs. independent? or mr. independent?
#8 | Comment by Kim — October 12, 2005 @ 12:22 pm
i might just have to pick up a copy of this cosmo girl issue to see what she has to say about all those other slutty young celebs.
ps: amanda has pretty feet
#9 | Comment by Justin — October 12, 2005 @ 12:33 pm
Chobot > Bynes
#10 | Comment by Bill Clay — October 12, 2005 @ 12:34 pm
LMAO amanda LMAO
#11 | Comment by Billy — October 12, 2005 @ 12:37 pm
BTW her movie career flopped. CAN YOU GUESS WHY, JUSTIN? LOLO
#12 | Comment by Billy — October 12, 2005 @ 12:38 pm
SHUT UP!!!
she has a new movie coming out someday! and it’s a beach movie! which means amanda bynes in a bikini!
in the meantime, i will go watch what a girl wants on dvd! which i’ve had since 2003 but still haven’t gotten around to watching!!!!!
#13 | Comment by Justin — October 12, 2005 @ 12:40 pm
Billy is SEXY. Oh and check this out:
psykotik2k: i want to be 14 year old girl!
psykotik2k: pink!
going to bed?? OR MAKING ANOTHER fucking amanda post?! HARD TO SAY.
#14 | Comment by supher — October 12, 2005 @ 12:44 pm
I agree with #14! PWNT
#15 | Comment by Billy — October 12, 2005 @ 12:46 pm
And she’s sucking in her cheeks in that picture. That’s the only reason why her face doesn’t look fat.
#16 | Comment by Bill Clay — October 12, 2005 @ 12:55 pm
I have to say, she’s lookin’ pretty good here. The first out of the series has to be my favorite. The b/w is ok, but like everyone is saying – a little too fake.
I would like to see what she says too. I think I wouldn’t like her anymore if she said something like, her Christian morals tell her partying and drinking and doing drugs are evil. I would hate her forever!
#17 | Comment by sycros — October 12, 2005 @ 1:08 pm
If there was a Mr. or Mrs. Independant, they wouldn’t be very independant, now would they?
#18 | Comment by michler — October 12, 2005 @ 1:17 pm
Yawn
#19 | Comment by El Payo — October 12, 2005 @ 1:31 pm
She looks like she has down syndrome in the last picture.
#20 | Comment by deez — October 12, 2005 @ 1:46 pm
She’s beautiful. I’ve upgraded Amanda from Cute to Beautiful.
I’ve never seen What a Girl Wants. I’m expecting an insightful, well-thought out review after your first viewing.
#21 | Comment by Ruprecht Jones — October 12, 2005 @ 2:01 pm
I agree with #14.
And I want some Mandy Moore. =(
#22 | Comment by wangdexian — October 12, 2005 @ 4:16 pm
Crap, I meant #5.
#23 | Comment by wangdexian — October 12, 2005 @ 4:17 pm
OMG #7 is right.
#24 | Comment by JVC — October 12, 2005 @ 4:17 pm
i just vomited on my weiner
#25 | Comment by heat — October 12, 2005 @ 7:21 pm
Hmm… she really doesn’t look as good with all the makeup/photoshopping on her. I want my Amanda all-natural!
Free-range Bynes!
#26 | Comment by Unlock Boss — October 12, 2005 @ 9:36 pm
ok justin, we get it…you
#27 | Comment by AngelBaby — October 12, 2005 @ 9:40 pm
wtf happened to my post??
#28 | Comment by AngelBaby — October 12, 2005 @ 9:43 pm
ok justin, we get it…you wanna hump amanda.
now can we get some pics of young celeb hotties (alba, biel, trachtenberg) who are actually hawt?
looking at bynes makes me wonder if there is an operation that can pull your eyes further apart, but seeing how your sockets are kinda set in your skull, i guess she’s SOL.
to bad yep.
#29 | Comment by AngelBaby — October 12, 2005 @ 9:46 pm
so… what are her secret Hollywood crushes?
#30 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — October 12, 2005 @ 11:55 pm
there should be an obligatory mandy post everyday!!!
#31 | Comment by turtle — October 13, 2005 @ 12:59 am
bynes >> trachtenberg
#32 | Comment by marsgwar — October 13, 2005 @ 1:34 am
Wow.
Let me repeat that:
Wow.
(And I agree with #21 on the upgrade from Cute to Beautiful.)
#33 | Comment by paperboy — October 13, 2005 @ 1:39 am
#32 couldn’t be more wrong.
#34 | Comment by AngelBaby — October 13, 2005 @ 3:14 am
^
dumb
#35 | Comment by turtle — October 13, 2005 @ 4:28 am
#20, she always looks like she kinda has down syndrome.
Justin hearts special-needs girls.
#36 | Comment by ButterscotchStallion — October 13, 2005 @ 7:06 am
chobot>big foot>bynes
#37 | Comment by hamster — October 13, 2005 @ 7:53 am
Boy George > Bynes
#38 | Comment by Bill Clay — October 13, 2005 @ 12:37 pm
Whoever says Chobot > Bynes is dumb.
Chobot > No one.
Bynes > All.
#39 | Comment by JessicaChobotSucks — October 13, 2005 @ 12:41 pm
“PERFECT?”
one eye is bigger than the other….
#40 | Comment by Travis — October 14, 2005 @ 1:24 am
Justin you are my hero.
I would lick her feet all day and everything else :o.
#41 | Comment by BastardotheGreat — October 17, 2005 @ 10:37 am