14 thoughts on “Amanda Bynes

  1. she looks like cher in the 6th picture

    #1 | Comment by iamthedevil60 — November 17, 2005 @ 4:13 pm

  2. I hate fucking first posters. I will kill all of you.

    #2 | Comment by Billy — November 17, 2005 @ 4:14 pm

  3. she look like a man

    #3 | Comment by Yo — November 17, 2005 @ 4:16 pm

  4. I think she’s gorgeous as usual. Just one question though: Does Austin Powers know his jacket is missing?

    #4 | Comment by Chris — November 17, 2005 @ 5:31 pm

  5. Asides are the new Gravatars.

    #5 | Comment by El Payo — November 17, 2005 @ 5:37 pm

  6. hahaha, big points to the first to photoshop number 5!!

    I think she’s about to suck a lolly-pop, hee hee

    #6 | Comment by NGEddie — November 17, 2005 @ 5:39 pm

  7. In reply to # 4. I gave it to her after a one night stand. She keeps calling me for more, but I keep having the olsen twins over for dinner. I force feed them bacon greece, and lard. SO I may one day have a one night stand with both of them.

    #7 | Comment by Austin — November 17, 2005 @ 7:44 pm

  8. fat face

    #8 | Comment by heat — November 17, 2005 @ 8:32 pm

  9. She needs a cheek reduction.

    #9 | Comment by Bill Clay — November 17, 2005 @ 10:36 pm

  10. zomg not hot.

    #10 | Comment by AngelBaby — November 17, 2005 @ 10:57 pm

  11. I love Amanda too. I don’t know about the outfit, especially those earrings. They look like a bracelet made by a young child for a kindergarten project.

    #11 | Comment by Elder Young — November 18, 2005 @ 4:43 am

  12. Amanda Bynes is hot? shyeah….hot as in fucking ugly as sin.

    stupid justin.

    she has a munted head, it looks like a waterlogged puppy chew toy and her eyes dont even look in the same direction. she looks like a pig.

    Bah. *vomit*

    #12 | Comment by UncleMao — November 18, 2005 @ 5:40 am

  13. The outfit is tacky and awful but I still love the Amanda nonetheless!

    #13 | Comment by Unlock Boss — November 18, 2005 @ 1:06 pm

  14. i love her

    #14 | Comment by eagel — November 26, 2005 @ 12:56 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *