Here’s one of the pics she’s suing over.
Only a thumbnail for now. Will post the fullsize versions if they ever show up online.
Here’s one of the pics she’s suing over.
Only a thumbnail for now. Will post the fullsize versions if they ever show up online.
i’d sue too…her boobs look tiny in that pic!
keke
1st!
#1 | Comment by AngelBaby — December 7, 2005 @ 11:44 pm
shit, that could be Justin topless its so freaking small.
#2 | Comment by parlayplyr — December 7, 2005 @ 11:49 pm
Justin’s penis isn’t even that small.
#3 | Comment by dex — December 7, 2005 @ 11:59 pm
local dj’s say they saw the pics and that she seems to have gotten enhanced post-Brad. They said the pictures could be seen on gorillamask but i couldn’t find…
#4 | Comment by smash — December 8, 2005 @ 12:05 am
I apologize for not knowing how to do the link, but here’s the URL
http://www.gorillamask.net/aniston.shtml
not the best quality pics, but you’ll get the point
#5 | Comment by Nate — December 8, 2005 @ 1:17 am
The gorillamask pics were fakes. They didn’t look like that thumbnail.
#6 | Comment by Nerima — December 8, 2005 @ 1:17 am
mmm boobs…
#7 | Comment by Utahcon — December 8, 2005 @ 1:18 am
#5 Nate
Those aren’t them.
#8 | Comment by Eamon Angelface — December 8, 2005 @ 1:31 am
Any 1 know where u can get the full sized pics from if so post the sitr nice 1
#9 | Comment by Teaguey — December 8, 2005 @ 1:32 am
Those are older pics (2003ish) but they are real, I am a photographer myself, and I can tell you that when you are shooting from an extreme distance even with a powerful zoom, you do get some grainy distortion. I can also tell that this is an enlargement of part of the frame of the shot, these would be like maybe 5% of the total image. if that. But these have been floating around for years. The shots that justin are refering to were taken facing her home over the summer. She is trying to sue, However since the photographer is off her property, and California does have a public nudity law. If she was in a part of her property exposing her chest where she could be seen by the public. than she was actually breaking the law. Sorry Jen if you see this, but that’s the truth.
#10 | Comment by Chris — December 8, 2005 @ 1:36 am
The Smoking Gun has details on the lawsuit.
#11 | Comment by steampunk — December 8, 2005 @ 2:16 am
shut up chris
#12 | Comment by michler — December 8, 2005 @ 3:57 am
shut up matt
#13 | Comment by dex — December 8, 2005 @ 4:01 am
I don’t see what the big deal is, I mean, we’ve all seen her boobs when she was topless in “The Good Girl”.
Plus, she must have not been much of a lay for Brad to leave her for Angelina “Can’t stop fucking adopting third world kids” Jolie.
#14 | Comment by Zahid — December 8, 2005 @ 4:52 am
Mmmm, Bite size Boobies.
#15 | Comment by Crackpot Live — December 8, 2005 @ 4:58 am
I love the Zahid logic. If we’ve ever seen you naked, you deserve no control over future images of yourself naked. Why don’t we just pass a law requiring anyone who’s ever done a nude scene to walk around naked all the time so we can see them anytime we want? Oh yeah, Kathy Bates.
#16 | Comment by TheGoodReverend — December 8, 2005 @ 5:00 am
First I thought this read..
Angelina “Can’t stop fucking adopted third world kids” Jolie.
Which is of course way funnier.
#17 | Comment by Eamon Angelface — December 8, 2005 @ 5:30 am
Stop invading her privacy, pervs. She’s a human being with feelings like the rest of us. PERVS!
#18 | Comment by kiko — December 8, 2005 @ 5:33 am
no shes not, shes a celeb, that means all privacy is gone and she is owned by us, we should be alowed to see her naked at any time we want.
#19 | Comment by Hamish — December 8, 2005 @ 5:35 am
That’s wrong. Very, very wrong, you heartless perv. She cries herself to sleep. She’s suffering. Don’t you care about that?
#20 | Comment by kiko — December 8, 2005 @ 5:41 am
All I care about is one day seeing the source pic for kiko’s avatar.
#21 | Comment by Nerima — December 8, 2005 @ 5:44 am
Thats the saddest thing I’ve heard all day.
#22 | Comment by dex — December 8, 2005 @ 5:59 am
#21 The original source is a poster that I bought at K-Mart for $1.99. I think the posters are still available. Run to your local K-Mart and buy one.
#23 | Comment by kiko — December 8, 2005 @ 6:20 am
K-mart sells underboob posters?
#24 | Comment by Nerima — December 8, 2005 @ 6:43 am
Am I the only one that fapped to the thumbnail?
What am I saying, of course not!
#25 | Comment by The Pope — December 8, 2005 @ 6:59 am
There’s probably only one left. Run. Run like the wind. Don’t let another perv beat you to it.
#26 | Comment by kiko — December 8, 2005 @ 7:31 am
hehe..
kiko said “beat”.
hehehehe.
#27 | Comment by monkeymachine — December 8, 2005 @ 7:48 am
Where is your poster now?
On your wall?
#28 | Comment by Nerima — December 8, 2005 @ 8:13 am
#16 Actually, I meant the brew-ha-ha around the net (Not necessarily this page)over her topless pics, not her anger over their release. I mean, we’ve all seen her naked, so, it isn’t like anything new.
Like, something I’d be interested in is the supposed Jessica Alba nip slip in a single frame of Fantastic Four that I heard about.
Not sure if its true, but i’m certainly going to rent the DVD when can.
#29 | Comment by Zahid — December 8, 2005 @ 8:16 am
Nate those were the pics from 2002 which she already sued over (and they weren’t fakes).
These are new pics of her with Vince Vaughn.
#30 | Comment by smash — December 8, 2005 @ 8:37 am
Is Vince naked in them too?
Not that I’m gay or anything, just curious.
But not bi-curious.
Not that theres anything wrong with that sort of thing.
Oh Screw it! I like Ballz ()()
#31 | Comment by Crackpot Live — December 8, 2005 @ 9:32 am
ooo my bad. someone told me that those were new pics, and i hadn’t seen them before. just trying to contribute once so i’m not just a goofy lurker
#32 | Comment by Nate — December 8, 2005 @ 10:33 am
#28 It’s on my bedroom roof right over my bed.
#33 | Comment by kiko — December 8, 2005 @ 10:38 am
You mean your ceiling? Or is it on the roof so the neighbors can see it?
Pleeeeease take a pic of that poster!
#34 | Comment by Nerima — December 8, 2005 @ 10:42 am
The ceiling. English is not my first language, dammit! I’ll not take a pic for a cheap bastard who doesn’t want to spend $1.99 for the poster. Besides, I wouldn’t know where to send such pic.
#35 | Comment by kiko — December 8, 2005 @ 10:56 am
#29, didn’t Alba already do a nudity/sex scene http://rapidshare.de/files/8796333/lllil.wmv.html
or is that someone who looks similar? :-/
I don’t really know, either way she hasn’t been hot for a couple years now.
#36 | Comment by omigosh — December 8, 2005 @ 11:12 am
36, I think that is Alba + her body double in “The Sleeping Dictionary”.
#37 | Comment by tool — December 8, 2005 @ 11:22 am
I think it is a shame that people go to those lengths to get topless celeb pics, and I feel a teeny bit bad for multimillionaire Jennifer Aniston. And I want to see the pics!
#38 | Comment by tool — December 8, 2005 @ 11:24 am
roflroflroflrofl
#39 | Comment by Billy — December 8, 2005 @ 12:45 pm
jen won’t have great looking boobies ever…they will drop so she should show them off now in a movie or magazine.
its faptastic.
#40 | Comment by fapper — December 8, 2005 @ 1:00 pm
Why do celebs always go topless knowing full well they are stalked day and night by people with cameras and then complain and sue when they get their picture taken topless?
#41 | Comment by JFetch — December 8, 2005 @ 1:24 pm
“Why do celebs always go topless knowing full well they are stalked day and night by people with cameras and then complain and sue when they get their picture taken topless?”
Publicity.
#42 | Comment by Trip — December 8, 2005 @ 3:06 pm
All this talk about celebs giving up their privacy by just being celebrities is a bit., well, fucking stupid.
When they’re out and about in public, sure. After all, they whore themselves to the photogs every time they go to an “event” by standing on the red carpet for half an hour posing for them all. Same as going to a topless beach.
When they’re in their own home, however, there’s a reasonable expectation of privacy. The photographer took these photos of her with a telephoto lens. She was in her yard, not in the middle of Rodeo Drive. She had a reasonable expectation of privacy, and it was violated. No matter how much you may hate these bega-rich fuckholes, they still have legal rights.
Allowing people to take photos of people in their own homes without permission opens the floodgates to all sorts of fucktardery. Kind of like how we already have pedo’s taking advantage of public space rules to take pix of children in their swimsuits.
#43 | Comment by jg — December 8, 2005 @ 6:55 pm
I’m a little bit in disagreement with you jg, tho I’m sure if I were a celeb I’d feel different.
Celebrities live HIGH off of the hog. Attending award shows give them gift backs like free plastic surgery, sidekicks, ipods, etc. Press tours give that PLUS photos PLUS pushing in our faces ‘go buy our merchandise’.
My point being, celebrities get the right to decide when and where to whore themselves out and the times they aren’t choosing it, we aren’t entitled to see them in a different light?
I call bullshit. I respect celebrities that don’t hawk shit OR what paparazzi after them.
#44 | Comment by smash — December 8, 2005 @ 7:01 pm
#35 – You would send such a pic to nerima1029@yahoo.com — or you would beg Justin to post it on fubar so we can all revel in its glory! Pppplease?
#45 | Comment by Nerima — December 8, 2005 @ 11:40 pm
more thumbs of the “new” set
eh
#46 | Comment by sesame_street — December 9, 2005 @ 12:10 am
Yup, methinks the topic starter has been conned.
#47 | Comment by Forster — December 9, 2005 @ 1:16 am
Check your e-mail #45. You’ll be disappointed.
#48 | Comment by kiko — December 9, 2005 @ 5:54 am
#48 – WOOOOOOO! That was sweet!
#49 | Comment by Nerima — December 9, 2005 @ 10:23 am
I can’t get access to the pictures, if someone could email them to me, that would be great. Thanks. JayIceRo@yahoo.com
#50 | Comment by NitzRomy — December 9, 2005 @ 12:36 pm
are you all still arguing over this dumb whore and her sad life?
#51 | Comment by tehpunk — December 9, 2005 @ 1:06 pm
Ditto that email please: googspam@googlemail.com
#52 | Comment by Forster — December 9, 2005 @ 2:34 pm
# 51
we’re arguing over her
cos noone cares about a dumb whore like you,
or your sad life.
#53 | Comment by goog — December 9, 2005 @ 7:05 pm
48 or 49…. hit me up, please. jamie_s_1980@yahoo.com
#54 | Comment by JAMIE — December 9, 2005 @ 9:54 pm
Can someone post larger pics????
#55 | Comment by jogger16 — December 10, 2005 @ 1:26 am
http://davidmarklandtruth.blogspot.com
#56 | Comment by David Markland — December 10, 2005 @ 2:13 am
Why did you delete my link to Jennifer Aniston topless pictures, Justin?
Naughty…
#57 | Comment by kerplunk — December 10, 2005 @ 3:33 am
hi all cant get acess to the jen pics keeps comming up google error if any 1 could sent them to me i would b eternaly greatfull nice 1 the e-mail is teaguey@hotmail.com
#58 | Comment by Teaguey — December 10, 2005 @ 5:26 am
can someoneone send me the jen pics, in large format! Thanks.
itjobs@alfy.com
#59 | Comment by jogger16 — December 10, 2005 @ 5:41 am
#57, because it was already linked here plus you didnt use html and your link was stretching the page!
#60 | Comment by Justin — December 10, 2005 @ 7:24 am
Sorry, #61 🙁
I STILL LOVE YOU!!!!!!!!!!
#61 | Comment by kerplunk — December 10, 2005 @ 9:08 am
Are you sure these are topless ones, I mean there so small and say “Jennifer Aniston sunbathing at the Cox-Arquette Home
Sunday, 15 May 2005”
I thought it just happened, and she was walkin around topless at her friends house???
#62 | Comment by Wild Bill — December 10, 2005 @ 10:30 am
david mark is a fag
#63 | Comment by m — December 10, 2005 @ 5:26 am
please send me the pics to hoja1972@arcor.de
Thank you !!!!
#64 | Comment by Luckyman — December 10, 2005 @ 9:02 pm
I’m still waiting for the pics of your hot sister, #49.
#65 | Comment by kiko — December 11, 2005 @ 4:31 am
Could someone please send large (if available, if not small will suffice) of Jennifer Aniston’s latest to Chum3232@Yahoo.com?
I can’t pull them up….
Thanks!
#66 | Comment by Chum32 — December 11, 2005 @ 1:09 pm
can some one send the pics to me If you get a chance. a_hole69@yahoo.com Thanks in advance
#67 | Comment by AHOLE — December 11, 2005 @ 4:58 pm
kollexioninc@aol.com Waht the hell why don’t you send me one as well. Thanks.
#68 | Comment by Fandango — December 12, 2005 @ 4:12 am
I’m going to spam all you porn grubbing fuckers.
#69 | Comment by Brass — December 12, 2005 @ 8:59 am
can yall send me your first born? please
greedy bastards, eh….
#70 | Comment by sesame_street — December 12, 2005 @ 9:45 am
Of course I’d love to see them
protoguy11@yahoo.com
#71 | Comment by donkeh — December 13, 2005 @ 12:17 pm
I am a lesbian
#72 | Comment by Lisa — December 14, 2005 @ 11:54 pm
hi, send here to please nycman1@gmail.com
#73 | Comment by ballbusta — December 15, 2005 @ 12:54 am
Can someone please send me the pictures as well, Krillik@aol.com
#74 | Comment by Jordan — December 15, 2005 @ 12:26 pm
I would appreciate the pics as well
krillik@aol.com
#75 | Comment by Chris — December 15, 2005 @ 12:29 pm
Sorry about the double post
#76 | Comment by Chris — December 15, 2005 @ 12:30 pm
Has anyone actually gotten them?
#77 | Comment by NS — December 16, 2005 @ 7:08 am
Someone please send them to me…
hydrexxx@hotmail.com
#78 | Comment by Nick — December 16, 2005 @ 7:10 am
Send please!!!
stul132@hotmail.com
#79 | Comment by Stu — December 16, 2005 @ 8:19 am
I also want this pics, please send to thevenomoftheasp@yahoo.com no sending the spam please only hotness photo of the Jennifer Aniston
#80 | Comment by Jazarus — December 17, 2005 @ 3:45 pm
Plz send also if its still active
creative.mess@gmail.com
#81 | Comment by Random — December 29, 2005 @ 11:11 pm
Hell, I would love the full size if they are out there. Help a man out! TedBrogen@gmail.com thanks
#82 | Comment by josh — January 3, 2006 @ 1:34 am
Would it be possible to get those pics as well? send to richard@rhch.net
#83 | Comment by Rich — January 11, 2006 @ 6:34 am
Hey, somebody want to send those pictures to me at jstern2@gmail.com?
#84 | Comment by Jake — March 1, 2006 @ 11:25 pm
Somebody should send me the pictures if you have them jeffd503@yahoo.com
#85 | Comment by JefFD — March 6, 2006 @ 7:16 am
holy crap. Don’t you people get it? If Justin gets them he’ll post them on the site for all to fap to … I mean look at. He’s nice like that.
If by a one in a billion chance anyone reading has them, don’t send them to these deviants. Send them to Justin.
#86 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 7, 2006 @ 6:44 am
please could you send me the pics to goc3000@hotmail.com
#87 | Comment by thegoc — March 10, 2006 @ 5:54 am
#87 nobody has them! If they did they would be on this site by now!
#88 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — March 10, 2006 @ 5:57 am