JENNIFER ANISTON TOPLESS

I HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS MOMENT SINCE MARCH 7 1996. THAT ISSUE OF ROLLING STONE WAS SUCH A COCKTEASE.

I SUGGEST FAPPING TO THIS POST HASTE.

IN BEFORE THE LAWYERS ISSUE A C&D.

UPDATE: SORRY PIC HAD TO BE TAKEN DOWN. LAWYERS ISSUED A C&D.

UPDATE 2: FUCK THE C&D.

PS: THE PIC IS REAL BUT SOMEBODY NEEDS TO PHOTOSHOP IN A BETTER FACIAL EXPRESSION.

Is the Internet ready for another Jennifer Aniston nude photo scandal? This one appears to even include vince Vaughn, as the stills may be from the film, ‘The Break Up.’ According to the gang at Jossip, there are allegedly some new nudes of Jennifer Aniston floating around and they will soon be available for sale. Of course, Jen’s lawyers have sprang into action and are already trying to shut down any and all who are trying to score some cash of Jennifer’s well toned body.

The photos apparently are from ‘The Break Up.’ In the film, Jen does a nude scene while trying to impress co-star Vince Vaughn’s character after getting her ‘Telly Savalas’ to tease her boyfriend and try to keep him from bailing on the relationship.

The mischievous Manhattanites give this report: Lavely & Singer, the Los Angeles power law firm that plays guardian to folks like Colin Farrell, is getting in touch with publications who might be interested in publishing a “nude or partially nude” photo of Jennifer Aniston that was, supposedly, unlawfully appropriated from footage shot for The Break Up, co-starring real-life fictional romance Vince Vaughn.

As you can imagine, they don’t want the photo out there, as you’ll recall what happened the last time a topless Aniston pic made the rounds. Teaming up with NBC Universal – which brokered The Break Up – they’re firing off this note to anyone who might be tempted to purchase those leaked pics.

The preemptive cease and desist goes on to say that should you be in possession of any of said photos, you must return them to NBC Universal.

47 thoughts on “JENNIFER ANISTON TOPLESS

  1. first

    #1 | Comment by jjm — February 10, 2007 @ 10:57 pm

  2. Saw it first on Egotastic – sry.

    She looks like a guy.

    #2 | Comment by BobBobson — February 10, 2007 @ 10:58 pm

  3. YA BUT NOT WITHOUT A HIDEOUS WATERMARK ACROSS HER TITS

    #3 | Comment by Justin — February 10, 2007 @ 11:00 pm

  4. She does have nice tits, regardless

    #4 | Comment by Adam — February 10, 2007 @ 11:05 pm

  5. Damn…her nipples are even better than I dreamed.

    YAY!!!

    #5 | Comment by smegmatic — February 10, 2007 @ 11:12 pm

  6. “somebody needs to photoshop in a better facial expression.” face

    Yeah, I said it.

    #6 | Comment by The Deadly Superman — February 10, 2007 @ 11:58 pm

  7. There are millions of girls 20 years younger than she is who wish their body was that tight.

    Kudos to Brad Pitt and Vince Vaughn on tapping that ass.

    #7 | Comment by Theo — February 11, 2007 @ 12:31 am

  8. […] From Don’t Link This: […]

    #8 | Pingback by JOE HUMPHREY DOT COM » Blog Archive » IT’S ABOUT TIME! — February 11, 2007 @ 12:35 am

  9. #3 – ya but there prolly wasn’t nearly as much shouting on egotastic.

    #9 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 11, 2007 @ 12:36 am

  10. ps. is anyone else wondering what the story in this mag concerning Kristen Bell is all about?

    zomg n00dz??

    😮

    #10 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 11, 2007 @ 12:38 am

  11. thank you for not capslocking the quote ;x

    #11 | Comment by Evestay — February 11, 2007 @ 12:48 am

  12. Thank you, thank you so much, you just made my day

    #12 | Comment by Licking — February 11, 2007 @ 5:49 am

  13. #9 – DONTLINKTHIS.NET – THE ONLY ALL SHOUTING WEBSITE ON THE INTERNETS. DO YOU LIKE HOT CHICKS? DO YOU LIKE SHOUTING? COME ON DOWN TO DONTLINKTHIS.NET! JUST OFF EXIT 50 ON HIGHWAY ONE! IT’S ALL SHOUTING ALL THE TIME!

    #10 – Sorry, no nekkid pictures of Kristen Bell on the inside OF THAT FRENCH RAG. I too was very disappointed. Can’t read French but they probably slammed her for not being able to sing like Edith Piaf and not being as funny as Jerry Lewis. Oh yeah, and not being more learned about the various French cheeses.

    #13 | Comment by Smiley — February 11, 2007 @ 6:40 am

  14. *yum*

    #14 | Comment by mrk101 — February 11, 2007 @ 7:12 am

  15. i always thought she had a nice rack.

    too bad she looks like alfred e. neuman.

    #15 | Comment by tehpunk — February 11, 2007 @ 7:13 am

  16. I love perky titties

    #16 | Comment by A-dog — February 11, 2007 @ 8:49 am

  17. Wich program do i need to open the .rar file that i got from Rapidshare??

    #17 | Comment by Charlioso — February 11, 2007 @ 9:29 am

  18. Hey, you havent done a post about the new Kim Kardishian sex tape. Its suppose to be released soon but they have previews. She’s makes for a good fap, I hope I see it here soon.

    #18 | Comment by Kevin — February 11, 2007 @ 9:53 am

  19. She’s so plain. She’s like mayonnaise on white bread with a glass of milk.

    #13 – lol

    #19 | Comment by d00d — February 11, 2007 @ 10:48 am

  20. fap fap fap fap fap

    more pictures, move the camera down!

    #20 | Comment by Whits — February 11, 2007 @ 11:18 am

  21. #18 – sorry we only post about sex tapes when an actual CELEBRITY is involved.

    tbytb

    #21 | Comment by AngelBaby — February 11, 2007 @ 12:21 pm

  22. # 17 – WinRAR works well…

    #10 – it says she is the enchantress of “Veronica Mars” or something (long time since I was in French class). But checked out the inside of the rag – even the see through bra has been airbrushed not to show anything.

    #22 | Comment by Webpager — February 11, 2007 @ 12:47 pm

  23. I noticed most of the comments were short, even the negative ones. I’ll be it was because they were using their other hand to fap to Jen’s boobs.

    #23 | Comment by Webpager — February 11, 2007 @ 12:54 pm

  24. meh,
    would’ve been good if we’d’ve* seen it ELEVEN YEARS AGO WHEN SHE WAS FAMOUS!
    *thats not a word, btw

    #24 | Comment by donkykong — February 11, 2007 @ 1:06 pm

  25. Doesn’t it seem odd that her nipples weren’t covered with tape (a common practice) since they were never meant to be in frame?

    #25 | Comment by buhr — February 11, 2007 @ 1:44 pm

  26. I’m faping as fast as i can.

    #26 | Comment by passthepanooch — February 11, 2007 @ 2:07 pm

  27. I’d rather see some pics of her ass from that movie.

    #27 | Comment by The Pope — February 11, 2007 @ 2:27 pm

  28. #25 yeah that’s what I thought, or even those stick on skin cups.

    Not a great photo but it will do. Her nipples were always one of the best things about Friends so it’s about time they came out to play.

    #28 | Comment by DisconcertedGeorge — February 11, 2007 @ 4:05 pm

  29. she’s been photographed all topless before… get some bush shots or stop talking in caps!

    #29 | Comment by Coolstream — February 11, 2007 @ 5:38 pm

  30. #25

    yea, or maybe they were going to actually shoot a topless scene, and then edited it out… because that part was cut from the original frame, it might be an edit from post-filming as in they decided not to use the topless scene, so they cropped it instead of re-shooting?

    I have no idea how any of that works, just a guess.

    #30 | Comment by Whits — February 11, 2007 @ 6:15 pm

  31. At #30

    I think they filmed it in Open matte style. When the full frame NTSC version was made it didn’t quite go down to her nipples, put when the PAL version was made it was just long enough to expose them in all their glory.

    If someone with a PAL fullscreen version of this movie can check it out, that’d be great.

    #31 | Comment by kinghajj — February 11, 2007 @ 11:52 pm

  32. Fappage Material indeed.

    “Fapping for Justice” ; thats the Motto.

    #32 | Comment by Captain Faptastic — February 12, 2007 @ 12:48 am

  33. Best nipples in TV!!!

    -FACT

    I’d bite ’em!

    #33 | Comment by MacDaddy — February 12, 2007 @ 10:04 am

  34. how bout a shot of her brazilian wax

    #34 | Comment by poss12 — February 12, 2007 @ 10:20 pm

  35. At least ten years too late.

    So… If these photos from the Break Up just showed up, is there some hope that the excised footage of topless Natalie Portman from Closer will oneday surface?

    (Pray with me, won’t you?)

    #35 | Comment by Bad, Bad Mormon — February 13, 2007 @ 1:47 am

  36. Damn no posting of old bags in this site please.

    #36 | Comment by thelaw — February 13, 2007 @ 2:20 am

  37. That is just @#$ing nasty

    #37 | Comment by thefilthelement — February 13, 2007 @ 7:08 am

  38. Her breasts are FANTASTIC ! Why on earth has she been trying to hide them all these years ?!? I hope she starts doing nude roles, her body is amazing, better than some 20-somethings ! And yes these are 100% real; Pictures AND breast!

    #38 | Comment by Dave — February 13, 2007 @ 9:44 am

  39. this is a fake it even shows it. so ther is no point getting all worked up cause there is hundreds of them, better ones at that

    #39 | Comment by tom foolery — February 13, 2007 @ 3:24 pm

  40. *sniff*, my fubar is all grown up now, no more teenagers.

    #40 | Comment by The Pope — February 13, 2007 @ 9:50 pm

  41. uhhh if it is a fake why are her lawyers scrambling to protect it? Dumbass.

    #41 | Comment by uhoh — February 14, 2007 @ 12:06 am

  42. shwing!!

    #42 | Comment by saconnie — February 14, 2007 @ 10:25 am

  43. Ya know, she’s got a goofy expression on her face, but that’s obviously part of the scene she’s in. She’s still beautiful. Very well built and still going strong, too.

    #43 | Comment by exelis — February 16, 2007 @ 4:22 pm

  44. AAAAAAAhahhaha! Funny trashyssimo your website 🙂

    #44 | Comment by Carmy Peckerwood — February 16, 2007 @ 4:49 pm

  45. http://www.totallycrap.com/galleries/galleries_jennifer_aniston_topless/

    #45 | Comment by Jon — February 20, 2007 @ 3:01 pm

  46. http://img363.imageshack.us/img363/7796/anistontoplessoj6ic3.jpg

    #46 | Comment by Ceypher — May 18, 2007 @ 3:01 pm

  47. […] This was the offending post. […]

    #47 | Pingback by Of all the C&D’s i’ve received… | dont link this — January 31, 2024 @ 11:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *