Oh my. I think not.

To: psykotik@gmail.com
Subject: question
From: “Barry R. Dean”
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:29:47 -0700 (PDT)

just have to say fubar is a badass site. i just read some gossip about omarosa…even tho i think she screwed up kwame’s chances on apprentice…anways taht bithc…well apparently she was in a photo shoot and was wearing no undies when winds starting blowing shit up and blew her dress up for everyone to see…


if you can find this pic…that would rock haha.

The linked article reads:

EVERYONE’S favorite villainess from “The Apprentice,” Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth (above), gave passers-by an eyeful in Central Park Thursday. While posing for Post photographer Lawrence Schwarzwald, a gust of wind blew up Omarosa’s dress – and revealed she wasn’t wearing any underwear. We’ve seen the snapshot that captured the magical moment, and let’s just say that Lady O could use a gift certificate to the J Sisters salon – soon!

Yeah. I think i’ll just pass on this one.

By the way, for those of you who didn’t get the J Sisters salon reference, the J Sisters specialize in (amongst other things) Brazilian waxes. Incidently, i posted about Brazilian waxing almost exactly a year ago, pointing out the glorious fact that Avril gets her poon whiskers plucked by the J Sisters. Yep. Avril has a bald eagle. At least i know she did about a year ago. Maybe she’s grown it out since then. Personally i can’t decide on whether i prefer a bald eagle or an amazon jungle. Maybe somewhere in between. Leaning more towards baldy. I dunno.

Also, notice the poll that i had up back then. I had a Avril layout up for the longest time and i figured it was time to switch (since i used to switch it around every coupla months or so). So i decided on Amanda Bynes. AND EVERYBODY COMPLAINED. Chief complaint? That she was too young (!). Instead, the suggested that i do a Hilary Duff layout instead. Hilary being a year and half younger! What the hell. So i ended up putting up a Daveigh Chase layout instead. It really freaked some people out.

By the way, i never did get around to telling you all what i actually did on this day did i?

Anyhow, since we’re all into Amanda now (probably because she’s not 17 anymore… as if that ever deterred me! ahahahaha!), here are a couple of classic Amanda posts:

  • Amanda post 1 with more reactions to the Daveigh layout!
  • Amanda post 2 featuring some kid that thought i was Amanda Bynes!

    Oh and no, i’m probably never gonna change this layout. EVER! Seriously, that picture that i have up on the layout right now, is the best picture EVER.

    Funnily enough, i’ve gotten lots of e-mails and IMs from people thinking that i made that pic in photoshop. It’s a real pic guys. All those girls actually got together in one room. A room i would call heaven. Masturbatory heaven. Hohohoho.

    Here’s the original uncropped, unedited pic.

    Seacrest out!

  • 20 thoughts on “Oh my. I think not.

    1. First post, bitches.

      #1 | Comment by buttsnake — April 18, 2004 @ 3:53 am

    2. Up high…

      #2 | Comment by buttsnake — April 18, 2004 @ 3:55 am

    3. down low…

      #3 | Comment by buttsnake — April 18, 2004 @ 3:55 am

    4. too slow.

      #4 | Comment by buttsnake — April 18, 2004 @ 3:55 am

    5. I fucking hate you people.

      #5 | Comment by radish01001 — April 18, 2004 @ 4:23 am

    6. Gross. Please don’t post. I bet she has a big ass cock.

      #6 | Comment by bah — April 18, 2004 @ 4:47 am

    7. Oh yeah baby!

      #7 | Comment by Thanks — April 18, 2004 @ 4:49 am

    8. anyone still got teh pics of avril’s bald eagle?

      #8 | Comment by bah — April 18, 2004 @ 4:52 am

    9. I heart Justin.

      #9 | Comment by Josh — April 18, 2004 @ 5:56 am

    10. I eat babies.

      #10 | Comment by Zultan — April 18, 2004 @ 8:29 am

    11. http://www.olsenfan.narod.ru/photos_ceremonis_et2003june.html

      #11 | Comment by joe — April 18, 2004 @ 9:37 am

    12. I look at those pics and all i think is orgy…

      #12 | Comment by Outlaw Torn — April 18, 2004 @ 10:19 am

    13. http://www.olsenfan.narod.ru/photos_ceremonis_et2003june.html
      Posted by joe – 9:37am April 18, 2004

      i look at those pics and all i think is damn it!!! could they be any smaller? and what’s with the super slow server?

      #13 | Comment by vhw — April 18, 2004 @ 10:53 am

    14. To be honest, I don’t think they all were ever in the same room for that picture. They were all photographed in pairs (except for poor Amanda) and then they were all photoshopped together.

      #14 | Comment by John Q. A. Thompson — April 18, 2004 @ 2:51 pm

    15. they were all in the same room! look at the pics on that olsenfan site. besides, it would have been too much work to photoshop all those interlocking limbs.

      #15 | Comment by Justin — April 18, 2004 @ 3:03 pm

    16. They all got together in one room? Vanity Fair could have photoshopped them together just as easily as Justin could.

      #16 | Comment by jonk — April 18, 2004 @ 5:00 pm

    17. Just went to the olsenfan site…I stand corrected — same room. However, I still disagree with the difficulty level of re-creating that in Photoshop. It wouldn’t be too difficult, interlocking limbs be damned.

      #17 | Comment by jonk — April 18, 2004 @ 5:04 pm

    18. i like that vanity fair pic. But no mischa barton?

      #18 | Comment by eddie — April 18, 2004 @ 10:44 pm

    19. I remember that layout controversy…I didn’t see what the big deal was…of course, that might have something to do with the fact that I’m not all that older then her…oh who am I kidding, I wouldn’t care no matter what my age!
      Of course, in the end it didn’t really matter since the Lillix look was ushured in after the Avril/Amanda/Daviegh days…
      Oh, but the top pic now…it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside…

      #19 | Comment by David The Lurker — April 26, 2004 @ 8:03 pm

    20. i think its photoshoped!who’s shoe is that under mandy’s foot?hehe

      #20 | Comment by Asty — April 28, 2004 @ 5:42 pm

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *